Electroencephalogram θ/β Ratio and Arousal in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Evidence of Independent Processes

被引:137
作者
Barry, Robert J. [1 ,2 ]
Clarke, Adam R. [1 ,2 ]
Johnstone, Stuart J. [1 ,2 ]
McCarthy, Rory [3 ]
Selikowitz, Mark [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wollongong, Sch Psychol, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
[2] Univ Wollongong, Brain & Behav Res Inst, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
[3] Sydney Dev Clin, Sydney, NSW, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Arousal; attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; electrodermal activity; EEG; hypo-arousal model; theta/beta ratio; DEFICIT-HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS; RESTING-STATE AROUSAL; EEG DIFFERENCES; CHILDREN; ACTIVATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.04.027
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Background: For nearly 20 years, the theta/beta power ratio in the electroencephalogram (EEG) has been used within the attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) literature as a marker of central nervous system (CNS) arousal, underpinning current models of the disorder. However, this usage has not been validated. We aimed to directly test the theta/beta ratio as a marker of arousal within this population. Methods: Resting state EEG activity was investigated as a function of CNS arousal in two age-matched groups of boys (each n = 30), with and without ADHD. Arousal was defined in terms of skin conductance level (SCL), which has a long history as a measure of CNS arousal. Results: Relative theta power and the theta/beta ratio were elevated, and SCL and relative alpha and beta power were reduced, in the ADHD group compared with control subjects. In both groups, mean alpha level correlated negatively with SCL. There was no significant correlation between the theta/beta ratio and SCL. Conclusions: These data contradict the supposed linkage between the theta/beta ratio and arousal in ADHD, confirming previous results from normal children. They suggest the need for reevaluation of current models of the disorder and reconceptualization of existing EEG data from both normal and atypical populations.
引用
收藏
页码:398 / 401
页数:4
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   A review of electrophysiology in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: I. Qualitative and quantitative electroencephalography [J].
Barry, RJ ;
Clarke, AR ;
Johnstone, SJ .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2003, 114 (02) :171-183
[2]   Caffeine effects on resting-state arousal [J].
Barry, RJ ;
Rushby, JA ;
Wallace, MJ ;
Clarke, AR ;
Johnstone, SJ ;
Zlojutro, I .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 116 (11) :2693-2700
[3]   Arousal and activation in a continuous performance task - An exploration of state effects in normal children [J].
Barry, RJ ;
Clarke, AR ;
McCarthy, R ;
Selikowitz, M ;
Rushby, JA .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 19 (02) :91-99
[4]   EEG differences in children as a function of resting-state arousal level [J].
Barry, RJ ;
Clarke, AR ;
McCarthy, R ;
Selikowitz, M ;
Rushby, JA ;
Ploskova, E .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2004, 115 (02) :402-408
[5]   HABITUATION OF PHASIC AND TONIC COMPONENTS OF THE ORIENTING REFLEX [J].
BARRY, RJ ;
SOKOLOV, EN .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1993, 15 (01) :39-42
[6]   Timing of caffeine's impact on autonomic and central nervous system measures: Clarification of arousal effects [J].
Barry, Robert J. ;
Clarke, Adarn R. ;
Johnstone, Stuart J. ;
Rushby, Jacqueline A. .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 77 (03) :304-316
[7]   EEG differences between eyes-closed and eyes-open resting conditions [J].
Barry, Robert J. ;
Clarke, Adam R. ;
Johnstone, Stuart J. ;
Magee, Christopher A. ;
Rushby, Jacqueline A. .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2007, 118 (12) :2765-2773
[8]  
CALLAWAY E, 1983, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V40, P1243
[9]   Quantitative EEG in low-IQ children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder [J].
Clarke, Adam R. ;
Barry, Robert J. ;
McCarthy, Rory ;
Selikowitz, Mark ;
Magee, Christopher A. ;
Johnstone, Stuart J. ;
Croft, Rodney J. .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2006, 117 (08) :1708-1714
[10]   EEG-defined subtypes of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder [J].
Clarke, AR ;
Barry, RJ ;
McCarthy, R ;
Selikowitz, M .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 112 (11) :2098-2105