Amisulpride compared with standard neuroleptics in acute exacerbations of schizophrenia: Three efficacy studies

被引:34
作者
Freeman, HL
机构
关键词
amisulpride; acute schizophrenia; positive symptoms; negative symptoms; extrapyramidal symptoms;
D O I
10.1097/00004850-199705002-00004
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Three double-blind studies that included acutely ill schizophrenic patients were undertaken to assess the efficacy of amisulpride, an atypical antipsychotic with a selective affinity for dopamine D-2 and D-3 receptors. In the first study fixed doses of amisulpride (400, 800 and 1200 mg/day) and 16 mg/day of haloperidol were compared with 100 mg/day of amisulpride for a 4-week period. Efficacy was assessed using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), subscales of the Positive and Negative Symptom Scales (PANSS) and the Clinical Global Evaluation (CGI). Data were obtained on 319 subjects with the revised third-edition Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSIM-III-R) criteria for schizophrenia. The highest improvement, in terms of BPRS total scores, occurred in the two groups taking 400 mg or 800 mg amisulpride. These doses also induced less extrapyramidal disturbance compared with haloperidol. The second study compared amisulpride with haloperidol: 95 patients were treated for 6 weeks with 800 mg/day of amisulpride and 96 patients with 20 mg/dag of haloperidol. Efficacy criteria were the same as in the first study. Amisulpride at 800 mg/day was at least as efficacious as 20 mg haloperidol for the positive symptoms of schizophrenia, but was significantly more effective against negative symptoms (PANSS negative subscale, P = 0.038). There was also a significantly lower incidence of parkinsonism in the amisulpride group. The third study compared amisulpride with flupenthixol: 70 patients mere treated with 1000 mg/ day of amisulpride and 62 patients with 25 mg/day of flupenthixol for a 6-week period. The mean improvement in the BPRS total score was greater in the amisulpride group, although this difference just failed to reach statistical significance (P = 0.059). Both drugs improved negative symptoms (Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms), but the effect was more marked with amisulpride. Differences were statistically different in favour of amisulpride for positive symptoms (Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms), depression (Bech-Rafaelsen Melancholia Scale) and estrapyramidal symptoms. These studies show that amisulpride has optimal efficacy at doses of between 400 and 800 mg/day. It was at least as effective as reference drugs in the treatment of positive symptoms, and also reduced negative symptoms. Furthermore, amisulpride provoked fewer extrapyramidal side effects than standard reference drugs.
引用
收藏
页码:S11 / S17
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
ANDREASEN NC, 1982, ARCH GEN PSYCHIAT, V39, P789
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1987, DIAGNOSTIC STAT MANU, V4th
[3]   A RATING-SCALE FOR DRUG-INDUCED AKATHISIA [J].
BARNES, TRE .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1989, 154 :672-676
[4]  
BECH P, 1981, Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica Supplementum, V64, P1
[5]   TREATMENT OF NEGATIVE SYMPTOMS IN SCHIZOPHRENIA WITH AMISULPRIDE [J].
BOYER, P ;
LECRUBIER, Y ;
PUECH, AJ ;
DEWAILLY, J ;
AUBIN, F .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1995, 166 :68-72
[6]   TREATMENT OF NEGATIVE SYMPTOMS [J].
CARPENTER, WT ;
HEINRICHS, DW ;
ALPHS, LD .
SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN, 1985, 11 (03) :440-452
[7]  
Guy W., 1976, Guy, W. (1976). ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology-Revised. Rockville, MD, U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public health Service, Alcohol, Drug Abuse, and Mental Health Administration, NIMH Psychopharmacology Research Branch, Division of Extramural Research Programs, DHEW Publ No ADM 76-338, pp 218-222., P218
[8]  
Hillert A, 1994, NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOL, V10, p31s
[9]   THE POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE SYNDROME SCALE (PANSS) FOR SCHIZOPHRENIA [J].
KAY, SR ;
FISZBEIN, A ;
OPLER, LA .
SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN, 1987, 13 (02) :261-276
[10]  
LINGJAERDE O, 1987, ACTA PSYCHIATR S334, V76, P81