Biomechanical analysis of legrest support of occupied wheelchairs: Comparison between a conventional and a compensatory legrest

被引:11
作者
Aissaoui, R [1 ]
Heydar, S
Dansereau, J
Lacoste, M
机构
[1] Ecole Polytech, Chaire Ind CRSNG Aides Tech Posture, Dept Genie Mecan, Montreal, PQ H3C 3A7, Canada
[2] Inst Univ Geriatrie, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] Univ Montreal, Dept Kinesiol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] Univ Tarbiat Moallem, Dept Phys Educ, Tehran, Iran
来源
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON REHABILITATION ENGINEERING | 2000年 / 8卷 / 01期
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
compensatory legrest; posture; pressure distribution; seating; three-dimensional (3-D) kinematics; wheelchair;
D O I
10.1109/86.830958
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 [生物医学工程];
摘要
This study was undertaken to investigate the effects of elevating legrest on posture and pressure distribution in a group of ten able-bodied subjects sitting in a manual wheelchair, Two types of legrest were tested: a conventional elevating legrest with a Fixed axis of rotation, and a compensatory elevating legrest with a moving axis of rotation. A three-dimensional (3-D) kinematics analysis was carried out to assess body posture simultaneously with pressure measurement data collected at the back, seat, calf and foot supports, The compensatory legrest enables to lengthen foot support as the legrest proclines, This compensation at the knee joint level has a beneficial effect in minimizing pelvic and thigh motion as well as in reducing pressure distribution under seat and foot supports. In contrast, the use of a conventional legrest modifies significantly the subject's posture and induces a substantial increase of 40% on pressure data under ischial tuberosities in procline position. These findings are important for disabled and elderly people who need to elevate their lower leg frequently.
引用
收藏
页码:140 / 148
页数:9
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]
ABEL EW, 1991, PROSTHET ORTHOT INT, V15, P38
[2]
Internal work estimation in three-dimensional gait analysis [J].
Aissaoui, R ;
Allard, P ;
Junqua, A ;
Frossard, L ;
Duhaime, M .
MEDICAL & BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTING, 1996, 34 (06) :467-471
[3]
AISSAOUI R, 1998, P RESNA 98, P110
[4]
BOCHDANSKY TH, 1994, P CAN SEAT MOB C TOR
[5]
BUSH CA, 1969, ARCH PHYSIC MED REHA, V50, P217
[6]
GILSDORF P, 1990, Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, V27, P239, DOI 10.1682/JRRD.1990.07.0239
[7]
COMPARATIVE EFFECTS OF POSTURE ON PRESSURE AND SHEAR AT THE BODY-SEAT INTERFACE [J].
HOBSON, DA .
JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 1992, 29 (04) :21-31
[8]
HOLLISTER AM, 1993, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P259
[9]
KIRBY RL, 1989, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V70, P681
[10]
Posture effect on seating interface biomechanics: Comparison between two seating cushions [J].
Koo, TKK ;
Mak, AFT ;
Lee, YL .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1996, 77 (01) :40-47