Eighths, sixteenths, and market depth: changes in tick size and liquidity provision on the NYSE

被引:170
作者
Goldstein, MA
Kavajecz, KA [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Wharton Sch, Dept Finance, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Coll Business & Adm, Dept Finance, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0304-405X(99)00061-6
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Using limit order data provided by the NYSE, we investigate the impact of reducing the minimum tick size on the liquidity of the market. While both spreads and depths (quoted and on the limit order book) declined after the NYSE's change from eighths to sixteenths, depth declined throughout the entire limit order book as well. The combined effect of smaller spreads and reduced cumulative limit order book depth has made liquidity demanders trading small orders better off; however, traders who submitted larger orders in lower volume stocks did not benefit, especially if those stocks were low priced. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science S.A. All rights reserved. JEL classification: G14.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 149
页数:25
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
AHN H, 1998, J FINANCIAL MARKETS, V1, P51
[2]   Tick size, spread, and volume [J].
Ahn, HJ ;
Cao, CQ ;
Choe, H .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION, 1996, 5 (01) :2-22
[3]  
AMIHUD Y, UNPUB OPTION MARKET
[4]   Tick size, share prices, and stock splits [J].
Angel, JJ .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 1997, 52 (02) :655-681
[5]   Market making with discrete prices [J].
Anshuman, VR ;
Kalay, A .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 1998, 11 (01) :81-109
[6]   The impact of decimalization on market quality: An empirical investigation of the Toronto Stock Exchange [J].
Bacidore, JM .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION, 1997, 6 (02) :92-120
[7]  
BATTALIO R, 1996, UNPUB WHY DOESNT DEC
[8]   Discrete pricing and the design of dealership markets [J].
Bernhardt, D ;
Hughson, E .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 1996, 71 (01) :148-182
[9]  
BESSEMBINDER H, 1997, ENDOGENOUS CHANGES M
[10]  
BLUME ME, 1992, 279I U PENNS WHART S