Qualitative methods - The view from the subfields

被引:15
作者
Bennett, Andrew [1 ]
Elman, Colin
机构
[1] Georgetown Univ, Washington, DC USA
[2] Arizona State Univ, Tempe, AZ USA
关键词
qualitative methods; international relations; comparative politics; American politics; case studies; research methods; research design;
D O I
10.1177/0010414006296344
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Qualitative methods are Currently Undergoing a renaissance in political science. with a rich new literature developing and disseminating them and greatly increased attention to preparing scholars in their use. Although this is a discipline-wide phenomenon, at the same time political science continues to be differentiated along subfield lines. The collection of articles in this sym-posium describes the trajectory of qualitative methods in three of political science's empirical subfields: comparative politics, international relations (IR), and American politics. Although Much of the new literature and training is self-consciously transdisciplinary, the subfields continue to exert a strong influence. These essays investigate the three empirical subfields to uncover some of the areas in which they have made more progress and therefore have particular strengths to share, to provide some examples of applications of qualitative methods outside of readers' own subfields, and to help make sure that future methodological opportunities offered by discipline-wide developments are not limited by subfield lacunas.
引用
收藏
页码:111 / 121
页数:11
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Abbott Andrew., 2001, Time Matters: on Theory and Method
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1997, New Thinking in International Relations Theory
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Bridges and Boundaries: Historians, Political Scientists, and the Study of International Relations
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1996, COUNTERFACTUAL THOUG
[5]  
Bates RobertH., 1998, ANAL NARRATIVES
[6]  
Bennett A, 2003, PS-POLIT SCI POLIT, V36, P373
[7]  
Brady HenryE., 2010, Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards, V2nd
[8]   Comparative politics - Diversity and coherence [J].
Caporaso, JA .
COMPARATIVE POLITICAL STUDIES, 2000, 33 (6-7) :699-702
[9]   CONCEPTUAL STRETCHING REVISITED - ADAPTING CATEGORIES IN COMPARATIVE-ANALYSIS [J].
COLLIER, D ;
MAHON, JE .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1993, 87 (04) :845-855
[10]   Democracy and dichotomies: A pragmatic approach to choices about concepts [J].
Collier, D ;
Adcock, R .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 1999, 2 :537-565