A tale of two tails: why are terminal residues of proteins exposed?

被引:99
作者
Jacob, Etai [1 ]
Unger, Ron [1 ]
机构
[1] Bar Ilan Univ, Mina & Everard Goodman Fac Life Sci, IL-52900 Ramat Gan, Israel
关键词
D O I
10.1093/bioinformatics/btl318
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Motivation: It is widely known that terminal residues of proteins (i.e. the N- and C-termini) are predominantly located on the surface of proteins and exposed to the solvent. However, there is no good explanation as to the forces driving this phenomenon. The common explanation that terminal residues are charged, and charged residues prefer to be on the surface, cannot explain the magnitude of the phenomenon. Here, we survey a large number of proteins from the PDB in order to explore, quantitatively, this phenomenon, and then we use a lattice model to study the mechanisms involved. Results: The location of the termini was examined for 425 small monomeric proteins (50-200 amino acids) and it was found that the average solvent accessibility of termini residues is 87.1% compared with 49.2% of charged residues and 35.9% of all residues. Using a cutoff of 50% of the maximal possible exposure, 80.3% of the N-terminal and 86.1% of the C-terminal residues are exposed compared to 32% for all residues. In addition, terminal residues are much more distant from the center of mass of their proteins than other residues. Using a 2D lattice, a large population of model proteins was studied on three levels: structural selection of compact structures, thermodynamic selection of conformations with a pronounced energy gap and kinetic selection of fast folding proteins using Monte-Carlo simulations. Progressively, each selection raises the proportion of proteins with termini on the surface, resulting in similar proportions to those observed for real proteins.
引用
收藏
页码:E225 / E230
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   STRUCTURAL ARGUMENT FOR N-TERMINAL INITIATION OF PROTEIN-FOLDING [J].
ALEXANDROV, N .
PROTEIN SCIENCE, 1993, 2 (11) :1989-1991
[2]  
Chan HS, 1996, PROTEINS, V24, P345
[3]   Implications of N and C-terminal proximity for protein folding [J].
Christopher, JA ;
Baldwin, TO .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1996, 257 (01) :175-187
[4]   Functional diversity of protein C-termini: more than zipcoding? [J].
Chung, JJ ;
Shikano, S ;
Hanyu, Y ;
Li, M .
TRENDS IN CELL BIOLOGY, 2002, 12 (03) :146-150
[5]  
DILL KA, 1995, PROTEIN SCI, V4, P561
[6]   N-TERMINAL MODIFICATION OF PROTEINS - A REVIEW [J].
DIXON, HBF .
JOURNAL OF PROTEIN CHEMISTRY, 1984, 3 (01) :99-108
[7]   DICTIONARY OF PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE - PATTERN-RECOGNITION OF HYDROGEN-BONDED AND GEOMETRICAL FEATURES [J].
KABSCH, W ;
SANDER, C .
BIOPOLYMERS, 1983, 22 (12) :2577-2637
[8]   The N-terminal to C-terminal motif in protein folding and function [J].
Krishna, MMG ;
Englander, SW .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2005, 102 (04) :1053-1058
[9]   Are structural biases at protein termini a signature of vectorial folding? [J].
Laio, A ;
Micheletti, C .
PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS, 2006, 62 (01) :17-23
[10]   EQUATION OF STATE CALCULATIONS BY FAST COMPUTING MACHINES [J].
METROPOLIS, N ;
ROSENBLUTH, AW ;
ROSENBLUTH, MN ;
TELLER, AH ;
TELLER, E .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1953, 21 (06) :1087-1092