Plant hydraulic conductance measured by the high pressure flow meter in crop plants

被引:172
作者
Tsuda, M
Tyree, MT
机构
[1] USDA Forest Serv, Aiken Forestry Sci Lab, Burlington, VT 05402 USA
[2] Okayama Univ, Fac Agr, Okayama 7008530, Japan
关键词
evaporative flux method; high pressure flow meter method; hydraulic conductance; root; shoot; water potential; variable conductance;
D O I
10.1093/jexbot/51.345.823
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
A new high pressure flow meter (HPFM) method for measuring plant hydraulic conductances (K) was investigated to examine whether its results are comparable to those from a conventional evaporative flux (EF) method in crops. Hydraulic conductance (K) was measured by the two methods under quasi-steady-state conditions in six crops grown in pots: soybean (Glycine max L. Merr. cv. Tsurunoko daizu), sunflower (Helianthus annuus L. cv. Russian mammoth), kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L. cv. Tsurunashi morocco), tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. cv. Sekai-ichi), green pepper (Capsicum annuum L, cv, shishitou), and eggplant (Solanum melongena L, cv, Seiguro chunaga nasu). There was a 1:1 agreement between K values measured by the two methods for K values of whole plant, root and stem, and leaf under quasi-steady-state conditions. Leaf water potential (Psi(leaf)) and evaporative flux density (E) in sunflower was curvilinear, indicating whole plant K estimated by the EF method increased with increase of E, Predicted Psi(leaf) (=E divided by whole plant K measured by the HPFM method) agreed with measured Psi(leaf). Diurnal changes were also found in K measured by the HPFM confirming that K changed in response to temperature and E. The HPFM revealed that variable conductance was located in all organs: roots, stems, petioles, and leaves. These observations indicated that the HPFM is valid for crops as well as for trees (as previously established by Tsuda and Tyree) and has advantages over the EF method because of the speed and ease of the HPFM method.
引用
收藏
页码:823 / 828
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   WATER TRANSPORT [J].
BOYER, JS .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1985, 36 :473-516
[2]  
Davidson N G, 1991, Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol), V3, P32
[3]   AN INTERPRETATION OF SOME WHOLE PLANT WATER TRANSPORT PHENOMENA [J].
FISCUS, EL ;
KLUTE, A ;
KAUFMANN, MR .
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1983, 71 (04) :810-817
[4]   INTERACTION BETWEEN OSMOTIC-INDUCED AND PRESSURE-INDUCED WATER-FLOW IN PLANT ROOTS [J].
FISCUS, EL .
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1975, 55 (05) :917-922
[5]   ON RESISTANCE TO WATER TRANSPORT IN CROP PLANTS FOR ESTIMATING WATER-UPTAKE ABILITY UNDER INTENSE TRANSPIRATION [J].
HIRASAWA, T ;
ISHIHARA, K .
JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CROP SCIENCE, 1991, 60 (01) :174-183
[6]   PLANT RESPONSES TO WATER STRESS [J].
HSIAO, TC .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND PLANT MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1973, 24 :519-570
[7]   EFFECT OF TEMPERATURE ON WATER TRANSPORT THROUGH PLANTS [J].
JENSEN, RD ;
TAYLOR, SA .
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1961, 36 (05) :639-&
[8]   MODELING DIURNAL TRENDS OF LEAF WATER POTENTIAL IN TRANSPIRING WHEAT [J].
JONES, HG .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 1978, 15 (02) :613-626
[9]   PLANT-RESISTANCE TO WATER-FLOW IN FIELD SOYBEANS .1. NON-LIMITING SOIL-MOISTURE [J].
JONES, JW ;
ZUR, B ;
BOOTE, KJ ;
HAMMOND, LC .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1982, 74 (01) :92-98
[10]   THE EFFECT OF VA MYCORRHIZAL INFECTION AND PHOSPHORUS STATUS ON SUNFLOWER HYDRAULIC AND STOMATAL PROPERTIES [J].
KOIDE, R .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 1985, 36 (168) :1087-1098