Energy expenditure estimation from heart rate: validation by long-term energy balance measurement in cows

被引:32
作者
Brosh, A [1 ]
Aharoni, Y [1 ]
Holzer, Z [1 ]
机构
[1] Agr Res Org, Dept Beef Cattle, Inst Anim Sci, Newe Yaar Res Ctr, IL-30095 Ramat Yishay, Israel
来源
LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SCIENCE | 2002年 / 77卷 / 2-3期
关键词
beef cattle; heart rate; energy expenditure; energy balance; reproductive cycle;
D O I
10.1016/S0301-6226(02)00033-7
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The use of heart rate (HR) measurements to estimate energy expenditure (EE) was evaluated, by comparing HR method with energy balance measurements during the reproductive cycle of mature beef cows. Six beef cows, 7- to 10-years-old and 607+/-29 kg body weight (BW) were used. Intake was measured individually. Organic matter digestibility of the diets was measured, and metabolizable energy (ME) and ME intake (MEI) were calculated from digestibility values. EE was estimated from daily HR measurements and oxygen consumption, calibrated against oxygen consumption per heart beat (O-2 pulse). Retained energy (RE) in cows' BW was calculated on the basis of BW changes, on the assumption that all changes derived from gain or loss of fat tissue. The energy content of the newborn calf and accompanying uterine tissues was calculated from the calf live weight at birth and published data. Milk production was measured on three occasions, as the weight increment of calves following suckling. Milk energy content was measured and the energy retained for milk production was calculated. RE for the entire trial, that is, energy in BW changes, plus the energy in the calf and accompanying uterine tissues, plus the energy in milk, was 4.53+/-1.09% of MEI. For the 1-year trial of the six cows, the MEI recovery, i.e. the ratio of MEI to (EE + RE), was 1.06+/-0.026, and the ratio of EE calculated by the difference (MEI - RE) to EE measured by HR was 1.06+/-0.028, which were not significantly different from the expected value of 1.0. Lactation increased dry matter intake (DMI), MEI, HR and EE. Late pregnancy increased HR and total EE but did not significantly increase EE per kg BW0.75, when BW included the uterine content. Reproductive state did not affect the O-2 pulse. It is concluded that: (a) energy expenditure of beef cows during the reproductive cycle can be calculated from HR and O-2 pulse; (b) the combination of EE and MEI measurements enables estimation of the feed energy available for production by non-constrained cattle. A significant correlation (P < 0.001) was found between the EE, estimated from the HR and O-2 pulse, and the MEI; this can be used in the reciprocal calculation to estimate MEI from EE measurement. The suggested method offers significant potential for future use in estimating the energy status of farm animals and in supporting management decisions. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:287 / 299
页数:13
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   DOUBLE-MARKER DIGESTIVE-TRACT MODELS [J].
AHARONI, Y ;
BROSH, A ;
HOLZER, Z .
JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 1994, 166 (04) :407-417
[2]  
Aharoni Y, 1999, J ANIM SCI, V77, P2291
[3]  
AHARONI Y, 1999, 5 INT S NUTR HERB AP
[4]  
Alderman G., 1993, Energy and protein requirements of ruminants: an advisory manual
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1984, NUTR REQ BEEF CATTL, V6th
[6]  
*AOAC, 1980, OFF METH AN
[7]   Simplification of the method of assessing daily and nightly energy expenditure in children, using heart rate monitoring calibrated against open circuit indirect calorimetry [J].
Beghin, L ;
Budniok, T ;
Vaksman, G ;
Boussard-Delbecque, L ;
Michaud, L ;
Turck, D ;
Gottrand, F .
CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2000, 19 (06) :425-435
[8]  
BROSH A, 1995, J ANIM SCI, V73, P1666
[9]   Effect of dietary protein concentration and source on the growth rate and on body composition of Holstein-Friesian male calves [J].
Brosh, A ;
Aharoni, Y ;
Levy, D ;
Holzer, Z .
ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2000, 70 :527-536
[10]   Effects of source and content of ash in poultry litter used in diets for beef cattle [J].
Brosh, A ;
Aharoni, Y ;
Levy, D ;
Holzer, Z .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, 1998, 131 :87-95