Adsorption, desorption and oxidation of arsenic affected by clay minerals and aging process

被引:251
作者
Lin, Z [1 ]
Puls, RW [1 ]
机构
[1] US EPA, Natl Risk Management & Res Lab, Subsurface Protect & Remediat Div, Ada, OK 74820 USA
来源
ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY | 2000年 / 39卷 / 07期
关键词
arsenic; natural attenuation; remediation;
D O I
10.1007/s002540050490
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Adsorption/desorption and oxidation/reduction of arsenic at clay surfaces are very important to the natural attenuation of arsenic in the subsurface environment. Although numerous studies have concluded that iron oxides have high affinities for the adsorption of As(V), very little experimental work has addressed the arsenic attenuation capacities of different clay minerals and aging process affecting the transformation of arsenic. The abundance of day minerals in a variety of geochemical environments and their influence on adsorption of contaminants suggests a need for more experimental work to characterize the adsorption desorption, and oxidation of arsenic on clay minerals. In this investigation three types of clay mineral were studied: the 1:1 layer clays [halloysite (IN), sedimentary M-kaolinite, and weathered EPK-kaolinite]; the 2:1 layer clays [illite (MT) and illite/montmorillonite (MT)]; the 2:1:1 layer clay [chlorite (CA)]. The halloysite and the chlorite had much greater As(V) adsorption (25-35 folds) than the other clay minerals. The clay minerals had lower As(III) adsorption than As(V) adsorption, and the adsorption was affected by pH. Desorption of arsenic from the clay minerals was significantly influenced by the aging process. The quantities of extractable As(III) and As(V) decreased with increasing aging time. The results demonstrated that oxidation of As(III) to As(V) occurred on the clay surfaces, whereas reduction of As(V) to As(III) was not found in any of the clay minerals studied. The oxidation of As(III) was affected by the types of clay and aging time.
引用
收藏
页码:753 / 759
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
*AM PETR I, 1951, 49 API
[2]   SOURCES AND DISTRIBUTION OF ARSENIC IN THE ABERJONA WATERSHED, EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS [J].
AURILIO, AC ;
DURANT, JL ;
HEMOND, HF ;
KNOX, ML .
WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 1995, 81 (3-4) :265-282
[3]  
Bowen H. J. M., 1979, ENV CHEM ELEMENTS, P239
[4]  
BREZONIK P, 1994, CHEM KINETICS PROCES, P180
[5]   REACTION-KINETICS OF THE ADSORPTION AND DESORPTION OF NICKEL, ZINC AND CADMIUM BY GOETHITE .1. ADSORPTION AND DIFFUSION OF METALS [J].
BRUEMMER, GW ;
GERTH, J ;
TILLER, KG .
JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 1988, 39 (01) :37-52
[6]   GROUNDWATER TRANSPORT OF ARSENIC AND CHROMIUM AT A HISTORICAL TANNERY, WOBURN, MASSACHUSETTS, USA [J].
DAVIS, A ;
KEMPTON, JH ;
NICHOLSON, A ;
YARE, B .
APPLIED GEOCHEMISTRY, 1994, 9 (05) :569-&
[7]   REVIEW OF ARSENIC CYCLE IN NATURAL WATERS [J].
FERGUSON, JF ;
GAVIS, J .
WATER RESEARCH, 1972, 6 (11) :1259-&
[8]   EFFECT OF PH ON ADSORPTION OF ARSENIC AND SELENIUM FROM LANDFILL LEACHATE BY CLAY-MINERALS [J].
FROST, RR ;
GRIFFIN, RA .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1977, 41 (01) :53-57
[9]   THE GEOCHEMISTRY OF IODINE - A REVIEW [J].
FUGE, R ;
JOHNSON, CC .
ENVIRONMENTAL GEOCHEMISTRY AND HEALTH, 1986, 8 (02) :31-54
[10]   ARSENIC GEOCHEMISTRY IN FORESTED SOIL PROFILES AS REVEALED BY SOLID-PHASE STUDIES [J].
GUSTAFSSON, JP ;
JACKS, G .
APPLIED GEOCHEMISTRY, 1995, 10 (03) :307-315