Cervical disc arthroplasty with the Prestige LP disc versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, at 2 levels: results of a prospective, multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial at 24 months

被引:107
作者
Gornet, Matthew F. [1 ]
Lanman, Todd H. [3 ]
Burkus, J. Kenneth [4 ]
Hodges, Scott D. [5 ]
McConnell, Jeffrey R. [7 ]
Dryer, Randall F. [8 ]
Copay, Anne G. [2 ]
Hui Nian [6 ]
Harrell, Frank E., Jr. [6 ]
机构
[1] Orthoped Ctr St Louis, 14825 N Outer Forty Rd,Ste 200, St Louis, MO 63141 USA
[2] SPIRITT Res, St Louis, MO USA
[3] Century City Hosp, Calif Spine Grp, Los Angeles, CA USA
[4] Hughston Clin, Wilderness Spine Serv, Columbus, GA USA
[5] Ctr Sports Med & Orthopaed, Chattanooga, TN USA
[6] Vanderbilt Univ, Sch Med, Dept Biostat, Nashville, TN 37212 USA
[7] Orthopaed Associates Allentown, Allentown, PA USA
[8] Cent Texas Spine Inst, Austin, TX USA
关键词
cervical disc arthroplasty; anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; artificial cervical disc; adjacent segment disease; INVESTIGATIONAL DEVICE EXEMPTION; DESIGN AFFECTS OUTCOMES; HETEROTOPIC OSSIFICATION; FOLLOW-UP; RADIOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS; REPLACEMENT; ADJACENT; ARTICLE; METAANALYSIS; SPINE;
D O I
10.3171/2016.10.SPINE16264
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
100204 [神经病学];
摘要
OBJECTIVE The authors compared the efficacy and safety of arthroplasty using the Prestige LP cervical disc with those of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for the treatment of degenerative disc disease (DDD) at 2 adjacent levels. METHODS Patients from 30 investigational sites were randomized to 1 of 2 groups: investigational patients (209) underwent arthroplasty using a Prestige LP artificial disc, and control patients (188) underwent ACDF with a cortical ring allograft and anterior cervical plate. Patients were evaluated preoperatively, intraoperatively, and at 1.5, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. Efficacy and safety outcomes were measured according to the Neck Disability Index (NDI), Numeric Rating Scales for neck and arm pain, 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), gait abnormality, disc height, range of motion (investigational) or fusion (control), adverse events (AEs), additional surgeries, and neurological status. Treatment was considered an overall success when all 4 of the following criteria were met: 1) NDI score improvement of a 15 points over the preoperative score, 2) maintenance or improvement in neurological status compared with preoperatively, 3) no serious AE caused by the implant or by the implant and surgical procedure, and 4) no additional surgery (supplemental fixation, revision, or nonelective implant removal). Independent statisticians performed Bayesian statistical analyses. RESULTS The 24-month rates of overall success were 81.4% for the investigational group and 69.4% for the control group. The posterior mean for overall success in the investigational group exceeded that in the control group by 0.112 (95% highest posterior density interval = 0.023 to 0.201) with a posterior probability of 1 for noninferiority and 0.993 for superiority, demonstrating the superiority of the investigational group for overall success. Noninferiority of the investigational group was demonstrated for all individual components of overall success and individual effectiveness end points, except for the SF-36 Mental Component Summary. The investigational group was superior to the control group for NDI success. The proportion of patients experiencing any AE was 93.3% (195/209) in the investigational group and 92.0% (173/188) in the control group, which were not statistically different. The rate of patients who reported any serious AE (Grade 3 or 4) was significantly higher in the control group (90 [47.9%] of 188) than in the investigational group (72 [34.4%] of 209) with a posterior probability of superiority of 0.996. Radiographic success was achieved in 51.0% (100/196) of the investigational patients (maintenance of motion without evidence of bridging bone) and 82.1% (119/145) of the control patients (fusion). At 24 months, heterotopic ossification was identified in 27.8% (55/198) of the superior levels and 36.4% (72/198) of the inferior levels of investigational patients. CONCLUSIONS Arthroplasty with the Prestige LP cervical disc is as effective and safe as ACDF for the treatment of cervical DDD at 2 contiguous levels and is an alternative treatment for intractable radiculopathy or myelopathy at 2 adjacent levels.
引用
收藏
页码:653 / 667
页数:15
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]
ROBINSON ANTERIOR CERVICAL DISKECTOMY AND ARTHRODESIS FOR CERVICAL RADICULOPATHY - LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP OF 100 AND 22 PATIENTS [J].
BOHLMAN, HH ;
EMERY, SE ;
GOODFELLOW, DB ;
JONES, PK .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1993, 75A (09) :1298-1307
[2]
High prevalence of heterotopic ossification after cervical disc arthroplasty: outcome and intraoperative findings following explantation of 22 cervical disc prostheses Clinical article [J].
Brenke, Christopher ;
Scharf, Johann ;
Schmieder, Kirsten ;
Barth, Martin .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2012, 17 (02) :141-146
[3]
MODIFIED SMITH-ROBINSON PROCEDURE FOR ANTERIOR CERVICAL DISCECTOMY AND FUSION [J].
BRODKE, DS ;
ZDEBLICK, TA .
SPINE, 1992, 17 (10) :S427-S430
[4]
CERVICAL STABILIZATION BY PLATE AND BONE FUSION [J].
BROWN, JA ;
HAVEL, P ;
EBRAHEIM, N ;
GREENBLATT, SH ;
JACKSON, WT .
SPINE, 1988, 13 (03) :236-240
[5]
Clinical and radiographic analysis of an artificial cervical disc: 7-year follow-up from the Prestige prospective randomized controlled clinical trial [J].
Burkus, J. Kenneth ;
Traynelis, Vincent C. ;
Haid, Regis W., Jr. ;
Mummaneni, Praveen V. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2014, 21 (04) :516-528
[6]
Long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of cervical disc replacement with the Prestige disc: results from a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial Presented at the 2009 Joint Spine Section Meeting Clinical article [J].
Burkus, J. Kenneth ;
Haid, Regis W., Jr. ;
Traynelis, Vincent C. ;
Mummaneni, Praveen V. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2010, 13 (03) :308-318
[7]
Changes in adjacent-level disc pressure and facet joint force after cervical arthroplasty compared with cervical discectomy and fusion [J].
Chang, Ung-Kyu ;
Kim, Daniel H. ;
Lee, Max C. ;
Willenberg, Rafer ;
Kim, Se-Hoon ;
Lim, Jesse .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2007, 7 (01) :33-39
[8]
Prevalence of heterotopic ossification after cervical total disc arthroplasty: a meta-analysis [J].
Chen, Jian ;
Wang, Xinwei ;
Bai, Wanshan ;
Shen, Xiaolong ;
Yuan, Wen .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2012, 21 (04) :674-680
[9]
Fusion versus Bryan Cervical Disc in two-level cervical disc disease: a prospective, randomised study [J].
Cheng, Lei ;
Nie, Lin ;
Zhang, Li ;
Hou, Yong .
INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2009, 33 (05) :1347-1351
[10]
Cho Hyun-Jin, 2012, Korean J Spine, V9, P209, DOI 10.14245/kjs.2012.9.3.209