Initial-Condition Sensitivities and the Predictability of Downslope Winds

被引:59
作者
Reinecke, Patrick A. [1 ]
Durran, Dale R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Atmospher Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
DATA ASSIMILATION; MOUNTAIN WAVES; GRAVITY-WAVES; ENSEMBLE; FLOW; SIMULATION; PREDICTION; TURBULENCE; STABILITY; EVOLUTION;
D O I
10.1175/2009JAS3023.1
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
The sensitivity of downslope wind forecasts to small changes in initial conditions is explored by using 70-member ensemble simulations of two prototypical windstorms observed during the Terrain-Induced Rotor Experiment (T-REX). The 10 weakest and 10 strongest ensemble members are composited and compared for each event. In the first case, the 6-h ensemble-mean forecast shows a large-amplitude breaking mountain wave and severe downslope winds. Nevertheless, the forecasts are very sensitive to the initial conditions because the difference in the downslope wind speeds predicted by the strong-and weak-member composites grows to larger than 28 m s(-1) over the 6-h forecast. The structure of the synoptic-scale flow one hour prior to the windstorm and during the windstorm is very similar in both the weak-and strong-member composites. Wave breaking is not a significant factor in the second case, in which the strong winds are generated by a layer of high static stability flowing beneath a layer of weaker mid-and upper-tropospheric stability. In this case, the sensitivity to initial conditions is weaker but still significant. The difference in downslope wind speeds between the weak-and strong-member composites grows to 22 m s(-1) over 12 h. During and one hour before the windstorm, the synoptic-scale flow exhibits appreciable differences between the strong-and weak-member composites. Although this case appears to be more predictable than the wave-breaking event, neither case suggests that much confidence should be placed in the intensity of downslope winds forecast 12 or more hours in advance.
引用
收藏
页码:3401 / 3418
页数:18
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
ANTHES RA, 1985, ADV GEOPHYS, V28, P159
[2]  
ANTHES RA, 1984, PREDICTABILITY FLUID, P247
[3]  
Barker DM, 2004, MON WEATHER REV, V132, P897, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(2004)132<0897:ATVDAS>2.0.CO
[4]  
2
[5]  
CLARK TL, 1977, J ATMOS SCI, V34, P1715, DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(1977)034<1715:OTEASO>2.0.CO
[6]  
2
[7]  
Clark TL, 2000, J ATMOS SCI, V57, P1105, DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(2000)057<1105:OOADCA>2.0.CO
[8]  
2
[9]  
Colle BA, 1998, MON WEATHER REV, V126, P28, DOI 10.1175/1520-0493(1998)126<0028:WATWSO>2.0.CO
[10]  
2