Weed suppression ability of three winter wheat varieties at different row spacing under organic farming conditions

被引:52
作者
Drews, S. [1 ]
Neuhoff, D. [1 ]
Koepke, U. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bonn, Inst Organ Agr, D-53115 Bonn, Germany
关键词
cultural weed control; organic farming; non-chemical weed control; wheat; crop competitiveness; COMPETITIVE ABILITY; SPRING WHEAT; MANAGEMENT; BARLEY; YIELDS; CROP;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-3180.2009.00720.x
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
For three seasons, six field trials were conducted in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) at different sites in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany. The aim was to evaluate the performance of three varieties, which differ in their shading behaviour, in suppressing weeds under organic farming (Okologischer Landbau) conditions and grown at three row spacings. The experimental factors were cultivar, row width and row orientation. Key parameters of crop and weed development, including ground cover and biomass, were assessed at different growth stages and analysed with ANOVA. Growth of the site-specific weed vegetation was significantly affected in five of six trials. Weed growth was reduced by cvs Astron and Pegassos compared with cv. Greif, and was lower at 12 cm compared with 24 cm row spacing. No effect of row orientation (East-West, North-South) on weed growth was observed. The more competitive cultivars Astron and Pegassos were taller than the less competitive cv. Greif and had higher ground cover and light interception, presumably induced by planophile leaf inclination and partly, in the case of cv. Astron, because of higher leaf area index (LAI). Narrow row spacing (12 cm), resulting in a more even spatial plant distribution, increased crop ground cover, LAI, dry matter and light interception. In two trials, the variety with planophile leaf inclination performed better at wider row spacing, suggesting that planophile wheat cultivars may be advantageous in wider row stands.
引用
收藏
页码:526 / 533
页数:8
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   EFFECT OF DIRECTION OF SEEDING ON YIELDS OF BARLEY AND OATS [J].
AUSTENSON, HM ;
LARTER, EN .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT SCIENCE, 1969, 49 (04) :417-+
[2]   SOME EFFECTS OF LEAF POSTURE ON PHOTOSYNTHESIS AND YIELD IN WHEAT [J].
AUSTIN, RB ;
FORD, MA ;
EDRICH, JA ;
HOOPER, BE .
ANNALS OF APPLIED BIOLOGY, 1976, 83 (03) :425-446
[3]   Weed management in organic agriculture: are we addressing the right issues? [J].
Bàrberi, P .
WEED RESEARCH, 2002, 42 (03) :177-193
[4]  
Beveridge LE, 1999, 1999 BRIGHTON CONFERENCE: WEEDS, VOLS 1-3, P939
[5]   Non-chemical weed management in organic farming systems [J].
Bond, W ;
Grundy, AC .
WEED RESEARCH, 2001, 41 (05) :383-405
[6]  
Buhler DD, 2002, WEED SCI, V50, P273, DOI 10.1614/0043-1745(2002)050[0273:AIAAOF]2.0.CO
[7]  
2
[8]  
CHRISTENSEN S, 1995, WEED RES, V35, P241, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-3180.1995.tb01786.x
[9]   Competitive ability and tolerance of organically grown wheat cultivars to natural weed infestations [J].
Cosser, ND ;
Gooding, MJ ;
Thompson, AJ ;
FroudWilliams, RJ .
ANNALS OF APPLIED BIOLOGY, 1997, 130 (03) :523-535
[10]   Dynamics of competition between wheat and oat: I. Effects of changing the timing of phenological events [J].
Cousens, RD ;
Barnett, AG ;
Barry, GC .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2003, 95 (05) :1295-1304