Benefiting from innovation: Value creation, value appropriation and the role of industry architectures

被引:446
作者
Jacobides, Michael G.
Knudsen, Thorbjorn
Augier, Mie
机构
[1] London Business Sch, London NW1 4SA, England
[2] Adv Inst Management Res, London NW1 4SA, England
[3] Univ So Denmark, Odense, Denmark
[4] Stanford Univ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
co-specialization; complementarity; factor mobility; dynamic capabilities; industry architecture; architectural advantage;
D O I
10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.005
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Extending Teece's landmark 1986 article, we consider how innovators benefit from value appropriation and creation. We elaborate on value appropriation, first by pointing out the importance of "industry architectures", i.e. sector-wide templates that circumscribe the division of labor; and second, by treating complementarity and factor mobility as distinctive components of co-specialization. This allows us to qualify Teece's prediction, by positing that firms can create an "architectural advantage" in terms of high levels of value appropriation without the need to engage in vertical integration. Such architectural advantage comes about when firms can enhance both complementarity and mobility in parts of the value chain where they are not active. We then elaborate on value creation by indicating how actors can benefit from investing in assets that appreciate because of innovation, which suggests that firms can benefit from encouraging imitation while investing in complementary assets. We also consider how investment in complementary assets changes the scope of the firm and thereby the development of capabilities that support future innovation. Finally, we provide an integrative guide that explains how firms should manage their position along the value chain to capture returns from innovation, thus extending and qualifying Teece's original 1986 predictions and prescriptions. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:1200 / 1221
页数:22
相关论文
共 92 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1995, FIRMS MARKETS EC CHA
[2]   2ND SOURCING AND THE EXPERIENCE CURVE - PRICE-COMPETITION IN DEFENSE PROCUREMENT [J].
ANTON, JJ ;
YAO, DA .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1987, 18 (01) :57-76
[3]   Understanding complex organization: the role of know-how, internal structure, and human behavior in the evolution of capabilities [J].
Augier, M ;
Teece, DJ .
INDUSTRIAL AND CORPORATE CHANGE, 2006, 15 (02) :395-416
[4]  
Baldwin C, 2000, Design Rules: The Power of Modularity, DOI DOI 10.7551/MITPRESS/2366.001.0001
[5]  
Baldwin CY, 1997, HARVARD BUS REV, V75, P84
[6]  
BALDWIN CY, 2006, HARVARD BUSINESS JAN
[7]  
Barney JB, 1999, SLOAN MANAGE REV, V40, P137
[8]  
BHAGWATI J, 1958, AM ECON REV, V48, P941
[9]  
BOUDREAU K, 2005, 456505 MIT SLOAN RES
[10]  
BRANDENBURGER A, 2004, BIFORM GAMES