Psychological disorders in patients with evacuation disorders and constipation in a tertiary practice

被引:99
作者
Nehra, V
Bruce, BK
Rath-Harvey, DM
Pemberton, JH
Camilleri, M
机构
[1] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, GI Unit, Sect Behav Med, Div Gastroenterol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Sect Colon & Rectal Surg, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.02184.x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the prevalence of psychological impairment in patients with rectal evacuation disorders and the influence of psychological disorder on the early outcome of behavioral treatment. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with rectal evacuation disorders referred for biofeedback retraining at a tertiary referral center. The psychological disorder was classified using the DSM IV criteria. Outcome of biofeedback treatment of evacuation at 2 wk was based on symptoms or on the ability to spontaneously expel a balloon placed in the rectum. Improvements in the groups without versus with a psychological disorder or an eating disorder were compared by Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: In the 60 patients (55 women; 5 men; mean age, 38 yr), psychological disorders were identified in 39 (65%); also noted were eating disorder (n = 5), rumination syndrome (n = 3), pain disorder (n = 6), anxiety-depression (n = 10), a combination of depression and pain disorder (n = 3), and a combination of eating disorder with anxiety-depression and pain disorder (n = 12). There was an association between psychological status and outcome at 2 wk of behavioral treatment for evacuation disorder (p = 0.03). The coexistence of eating disorder and psychological disorder resulted in an unfavorable outcome (p = 0.02), compared with those without psychological disorder. CONCLUSION: Psychological impairment was identified in 65% of the patients with evacuation disorder and constipation in a tertiary care practice, and has a significant negative impact on the outcome of behavioral treatment. These data reinforce the importance of a multidisciplinary approach in the management of these patients. (C) 2000 by Am. Cell. of Gastroenterology).
引用
收藏
页码:1755 / 1758
页数:4
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1999, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V116, P732, DOI 10.1016/S0016-5085(99)70195-2
[2]  
CHAMI TN, 1991, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V11, pA427
[3]  
CHEN AB, 1997, GASTROENTEROLOGY, V92, P1879
[4]   BIOFEEDBACK TRAINING IN DISORDERED DEFECATION - A CRITICAL-REVIEW [J].
ENCK, P .
DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 1993, 38 (11) :1953-1960
[5]   Therapeutic strategies for motility disorders - Medications, nutrition, biofeedback, and hypnotherapy [J].
Farrugia, G ;
Camilleri, M ;
Whitehead, WE .
GASTROENTEROLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1996, 25 (01) :225-+
[6]   Outcome and predictors of success of biofeedback for constipation [J].
Gilliland, R ;
Heymen, S ;
Altomare, DF ;
Park, UC ;
Vickers, D ;
Wexner, SD .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1997, 84 (08) :1123-1126
[7]   DELAYED GASTROINTESTINAL TRANSIT TIMES IN ANOREXIA-NERVOSA AND BULIMIA-NERVOSA [J].
KAMAL, N ;
CHAMI, T ;
ANDERSEN, A ;
ROSELL, FA ;
SCHUSTER, MM ;
WHITEHEAD, WE .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1991, 101 (05) :1320-1324
[8]   APPLICATION OF THE COLORECTAL LABORATORY IN DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OF FUNCTIONAL CONSTIPATION [J].
KUIJPERS, HC .
DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 1990, 33 (01) :35-39
[9]   Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders [J].
Mittal, Vijay A. ;
Walker, Elaine F. .
PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2011, 189 (01) :158-159
[10]  
SURRENTI E, 1995, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V90, P1471