NIH funding in family medicine: An analysis of 2003 awards

被引:17
作者
Rabinowitz, Howard K. [1 ]
Becker, Julie A. [1 ]
Gregory, Naomi D. [1 ]
Wender, Richard C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Jefferson Med Coll, Dept Family & Community Med, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
关键词
research/funding; family practice; National Institutes of Health (US);
D O I
10.1370/afm.555
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 [公共卫生与预防医学]; 120402 [社会医学与卫生事业管理];
摘要
PURPOSE We wanted to analyze National Institutes of Health (NIH) awards to departments of family medicine. METHODS We obtained the list of NIH awards to departments of family medicine in 2003, and collected additional information from the Internet regarding each principal investigator (PI), including whether he or she worked primarily in a core (central) organizational component within a family medicine department. RESULTS One hundred forty-nine NIH awards were granted to 45 departments of family medicine, for a total of $60,085,000. Of 146 awards with a designated PI, approximately two thirds of awards (89, 61%) and awarded dollars ($39,850,000, 70%) went to PIS who were either not full-time family medicine faculty primarily working in family medicine departments, or they were not working in core family medicine organizational components. Few awards to physician Pls in these noncore areas were to family physicians (4 of 37, 11%), whereas most awards to physician Pis in core family medicine areas went to family physicians (40 of 45, 89%). In contrast, most K awards (research career programs) went to Pls in core areas (19 of 23, 83%), and most to family physicians (17 of 23, 74%). Nationally, only 17 RO1 awards (research project, traditional) went to family physicians. CONCLUSIONS Most NIH awards to family medicine departments went to Pls in noncore organizational components, where most physician Pls were not family physicians. Family medicine departments interested in increasing NIH funding may want to consider 4 models that appear to exist: individual faculty in core departmental components, K awards, core faculty also working in university-wide organizational components that provide research infrastructure, and integrating noncore administrative components into the department.
引用
收藏
页码:437 / 442
页数:6
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]
The research productivity of faculty in family medicine departments at USmedical schools: A national study [J].
Brocato, JJ ;
Mavis, B .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2005, 80 (03) :244-252
[2]
Campos-Outcalt D, 1999, Fam Med, V31, P709
[3]
Practice-based research networks - The laboratories of primary care research [J].
Lindbloom, EJ ;
Ewigman, BG ;
Hickner, JM .
MEDICAL CARE, 2004, 42 (04) :45-49
[4]
A comparison of family medicine research in research intense and less intense institutions [J].
Mainous, AG ;
Hueston, WJ ;
Ye, XB ;
Bazell, C .
ARCHIVES OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2000, 9 (10) :1100-1104
[5]
Distribution of research awards from the National Institutes of Health among medical schools [J].
Moy, E ;
Griner, PF ;
Challoner, DR ;
Perry, DR .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2000, 342 (04) :250-255
[6]
MURATA PJ, 1992, J FAM PRACTICE, V35, P417
[7]
*NIH, NIH FY 2003 EXTR AW
[8]
Roberts RG, 2004, ANN FAM MED S1, V2, pS88
[9]
Stange KC, 2001, FAM MED, V33, P286
[10]
Why family practice research? [J].
Weiss, BD .
ARCHIVES OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2000, 9 (10) :1105-1107