Postnatal psychiatric morbidity:: a validation study of the GHQ-12 and the EPDS as screening tools

被引:92
作者
Navarro, Purificacion
Ascaso, Carlos
Garcia-Esteve, Lluisa
Aguado, Jaume
Torres, Anna
Martin-Santos, Rocio
机构
[1] Univ Barcelona, Hosp Clin Barcelona, Unit Perinatal Psychiat & Gender Res, E-08028 Barcelona, Spain
[2] Univ Barcelona, Dept Publ Hlth, E-08036 Barcelona, Spain
[3] IDIBAPS, Barcelona 08036, Spain
[4] Hosp Del Mar, Drug Abuse & Psychiat Dept, Barcelona 08003, Spain
[5] IMIM, Pharmacol Res Unit, Barcelona 08003, Spain
关键词
EPDS; GHQ-12; validation; postnatal anxiety; postnatal depression;
D O I
10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2006.10.004
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess the validity of the 12-Item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) in screening for the most common postnatal psychiatric morbidities (mood, anxiety and adjustment disorders). Method: A two-phase cross-sectional study was designed. First, a sample of 1453 women visiting at 6 weeks postpartum completed the GHQ-12 and the EPDS questionnaires. Second, based upon EPDS outcomes, participants were stratified and randomly selected within each stratum for clinical evaluation [Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SLID)]. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used. Results: The concurrent validity was satisfactory (0.80). At optimum cut-off scores, both GHQ-12 and EPDS yielded very good sensitivity (80; 85.5) and specificity (80.4; 85.3), respectively. ROC curves showed that the performance of the EPDS (AUC=0.933) is slightly superior to that of GHQ-12 (AUC=0.904). Conclusion: Both GHQ-12 and EPDS are valid instruments to detect postnatal depression as well as postnatal anxiety and adjustment disorders. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 7
页数:7
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   An international study exploring levels of postpartum depressive symptomatology [J].
Affonso, DD ;
De, AK ;
Horowitz, JA ;
Mayberry, LJ .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 2000, 49 (03) :207-216
[2]  
ASCASO TC, 2003, MED CLIN-BARCELONA, V15, P326
[3]   Practising by the evidence: The role of pathology [J].
Batstone, G .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1997, 50 (06) :447-448
[4]   Review of screening instruments for postpartum depression [J].
Boyd, RC ;
Le, HN ;
Somberg, R .
ARCHIVES OF WOMENS MENTAL HEALTH, 2005, 8 (03) :141-153
[5]   Postpartum psychiatric disorders [J].
Brockington, I .
LANCET, 2004, 363 (9405) :303-310
[6]   Does the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale measure anxiety? [J].
Brouwers, EPM ;
van Baar, AL ;
Pop, VJM .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 2001, 51 (05) :659-663
[7]   A COEFFICIENT OF AGREEMENT FOR NOMINAL SCALES [J].
COHEN, J .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1960, 20 (01) :37-46
[8]   NON-PSYCHOTIC PSYCHIATRIC-DISORDER AFTER CHILDBIRTH - A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY OF PREVALENCE, INCIDENCE, COURSE AND NATURE [J].
COOPER, PJ ;
CAMPBELL, EA ;
DAY, A ;
KENNERLEY, H ;
BOND, A .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1988, 152 :799-806
[9]  
COX JL, 1987, BRIT J PSYCHIAT, V150, P782, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-1694-0_2
[10]   The validity of the 12-item General Health Questionnaire in Australia: a comparison between three scoring methods [J].
Donath, S .
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2001, 35 (02) :231-235