Are rheumatologists' treatment decisions influenced by patients' age?

被引:61
作者
Fraenkel, L.
Rabidou, N.
Dhar, R.
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Rheumatol Sect, Dept Med,VA Connecticut Healthcare Syst, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[2] Yale Univ, Sch Management, Dept Marketing, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
关键词
rheumatoid arthritis; disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs; decision-making;
D O I
10.1093/rheumatology/kel144
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100201 [内科学];
摘要
Objectives. The objective of this study was to determine whether physicians' treatment preferences are influenced by patients' age. Methods. We mailed a survey to a random sample of rheumatologists practicing in the US. The survey included a scenario describing a hypothetical patient with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) on hydroxychloroquine, sulfasalazine and low-dose prednisolone, who presents with active disease during a follow-up appointment. The scenario was formulated in two versions that were identical except for the age of the patient. After reading the scenario, respondents were asked to rate (on a 10 cm numerical rating scale) their recommendations for each of the three options: (i) increasing the dose of prednisolone, (ii) adding a new disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) and (iii) switching DMARDs. Rheumatologists who rated either adding a new DMARD or switching DMARDs higher than increasing the dose of prednisolone were classified as 'preferring aggressive treatment with DMARDs', while the others were classified as 'NOT preferring aggressive treatment with DMARDs'. Results. A total of 480 rheumatologists were mailed a questionnaire; 204 responded, giving a response rate of 42.5%. Overall 163 (80%) respondents were classified as preferring aggressive treatment with DMARDs. Rheumatologists responding to this survey were more likely to prefer aggressive DMARD treatment for the young RA patient vs the older RA patient (87 vs 71%, P= 0.007). Conclusions. Our findings suggest that rheumatologists' treatment recommendations may be influenced by age. Future educational efforts should increase physician awareness of this possible bias in order to ensure equal service delivery across ages.
引用
收藏
页码:1555 / 1557
页数:3
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]
Is there age bias in the treatment of localized prostate carcinoma? [J].
Alibhai, SMH ;
Krahn, MD ;
Cohen, MM ;
Fleshner, NE ;
Tomlinson, GA ;
Naglie, G .
CANCER, 2004, 100 (01) :72-81
[2]
Examination of gender bias in the evaluation and treatment of angina pectoris by cardiologists [J].
Blum, M ;
Slade, M ;
Boden, D ;
Cabin, H ;
Caulin-Glaser, T .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 93 (06) :765-767
[3]
Biological drug use: US perspectives on indications and monitoring [J].
Cush, JJ .
ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2005, 64 :18-23
[4]
THE INFLUENCE OF GENERAL AND CASE-RELATED EXPERIENCE ON PRIMARY CARE TREATMENT DECISION-MAKING [J].
GRUPPEN, LD ;
WOLF, FM ;
VANVOORHEES, C ;
STROSS, JK .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1988, 148 (12) :2657-2663
[5]
DIAGNOSTIC TESTING IN ACUTE MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION - DOES PATIENT AGE INFLUENCE UTILIZATION PATTERNS - THE WORCESTER HEART-ATTACK STUDY [J].
GURWITZ, JH ;
OSGANIAN, V ;
GOLDBERG, RJ ;
CHEN, Z ;
GORE, JM ;
ALPERT, JS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1991, 134 (09) :948-957
[6]
Harrison MJ, 2005, J RHEUMATOL, V32, P1243
[7]
A comparison of visual analogue and numerical rating scale formats for the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS): Does format affect patient ratings of symptoms and quality of life? [J].
Hollen, PJ ;
Gralla, RJ ;
Kris, MG ;
McCoy, S ;
Donaldson, GW ;
Moinpour, CM .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2005, 14 (03) :837-847
[8]
Patients' perceptions of physicians' recommendations for comfort care differ by patient age and gender [J].
Johnson, MF ;
Lin, M ;
Mangalik, S ;
Murphy, DJ ;
Kramer, AM .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2000, 15 (04) :248-255
[9]
Kremers HM, 2004, J RHEUMATOL, V31, P2366
[10]
Gender and referral for coronary angiography after treadmill thallium testing [J].
Lauer, MS ;
Pashkow, FJ ;
Snader, CE ;
Harvey, SA ;
Thomas, JD ;
Marwick, TH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1996, 78 (03) :278-283