Factor analysis of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory: Structure and validity

被引:42
作者
Bohac, DL
Malec, JF
Moessner, AM
机构
关键词
D O I
10.1080/713802185
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Principal-components (PC) factor analysis of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory (MPAI) was conducted using a sample of outpatients (n = 189) with acquired brain injury (ABI) to evaluate whether outcome after ABI is multifactorial or unifactorial in nature. An eight-factor model was derived which explained 64.4% of the total variance. The right factors were interpreted as representing Activities of Daily Living, Social Initiation, Cognition, Impaired-Self-awareness/Distress, Social Skills/Support, Independence, Visuoperceptual, and Psychiatric, respectively. Validation of the Cognition factor was supported when factor scores were correlated with various neuropsychological measures. In addition, 117 patient sell-rating total scores were used to evaluate the Impaired Self-awareness/Distress factor. An inverse relationship was observed, supporting this factor's ability to capture the two-dimensional phenomena of diminished sell-awareness or enhanced emotional distress. A new subscale structure is suggested, that may allow greater clinical utility in understanding how ABI manifests in patients, and may provide clinicians with a better structure for implementing treatment strategies to address specific areas of impairment and disability for specific patients. Additionally, more precise measurement of treatment outcomes may be afforded by this reorganization.
引用
收藏
页码:469 / 482
页数:14
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Functional outcome from traumatic brain injury - Unidimensional or multidimensional? [J].
Boake, C ;
High, WM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 1996, 75 (02) :105-113
[2]  
HAGEN C, 1979, AM SPEECH LANG HEAR
[3]  
Hall K.M., 1993, Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, V8, P60, DOI [10.1097/00001199-199308020-00008, DOI 10.1097/00001199-199308020-00008]
[4]   DISABILITY AFTER SEVERE HEAD-INJURY - OBSERVATIONS ON THE USE OF THE GLASGOW OUTCOME SCALE [J].
JENNETT, B ;
SNOEK, J ;
BOND, MR ;
BROOKS, N .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 1981, 44 (04) :285-293
[5]  
KAPLAN S, 1988, J APPLIED REHABILITA, V19, P3
[6]   THE NEUROBEHAVIORAL RATING-SCALE - ASSESSMENT OF THE BEHAVIORAL SEQUELAE OF HEAD-INJURY BY THE CLINICIAN [J].
LEVIN, HS ;
HIGH, WM ;
GOETHE, KE ;
SISSON, RA ;
OVERALL, JE ;
RHOADES, HM ;
EISENBERG, HM ;
KALISKY, Z ;
GARY, HE .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 1987, 50 (02) :183-193
[7]  
LEVINE MJ, 1993, BRAIN INJURY, V7, P53
[8]  
Lezak MD, 1987, J HEAD TRAUMA REHAB, V2, P57, DOI DOI 10.1097/00001199-198703000-00009
[9]  
LEZAK MD, 1995, NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL A, P766
[10]  
Malec JF., 1994, J HEAD TRAUMA REHAB, V9, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1097/00001199-199412000-00003, 10. 1097/ 00001199- 199412000- 00003]