Estimated costs for uterine artery embolization and abdominal myomectomy for uterine leiomyomata: A comparative study at a single institution

被引:26
作者
Baker, CM
Winkel, CA
Subramanian, S
Spies, JB
机构
[1] Georgetown Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Washington, DC 20007 USA
[2] Georgetown Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Washington, DC 20007 USA
[3] Hlth Econ, Waltham, MA USA
关键词
fibroid; uterine arteries; embolization; uterus; neoplasms;
D O I
10.1016/S1051-0443(07)61966-6
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To determine and compare the costs associated with uterine artery embolization (UAE) and abdominal myomectomy for the treatment of symptomatic leiomyomata. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Charge information was gathered and analyzed from 23 patients who underwent UAE and 17 who underwent abdominal myomectomy in a single institution. The mean charges for each procedure were calculated from the patients' billing data. Cost-to-charge ratios were applied to the mean charges to estimate costs. The work relative value units (RVUs) for all physician services for each procedure were calculated. These total work RVUs for each intervention were multiplied by the appropriate Medicare conversion factors to estimate a uniform physician fee. These costs were totaled and compared with use of the unpaired t test to estimate the cost difference between UAE and abdominal myomectomy. RESULTS: The estimated hospital cost for UAE was $3,193, which was significantly lower than the $5,598 estimated for abdominal myomectomy (P <.0001). The discrepancy was caused primarily by increased hospital care and operating room costs for abdominal myomectomy. The total professional costs were significantly higher for UAE ($2,220) than for abdominal myomectomy ($1,611) (P =.002). When all associated costs, including typical imaging costs, were considered, there was a trend toward lower costs for UAE ($6,708) compared to abdominal myomectomy ($7,630) (P =.086). CONCLUSION: UAE had lower procedure-related costs than abdominal myomectomy despite higher physician costs. When typical imaging costs were included, there was still a trend toward lower costs for UAE.
引用
收藏
页码:1207 / 1210
页数:4
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] RISK OF RECURRENCE AFTER MYOMECTOMY
    CANDIANI, GB
    FEDELE, L
    PARAZZINI, F
    VILLA, L
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1991, 98 (04): : 385 - 389
  • [2] Long-term results of hysteroscopic myomectomy for abnormal uterine bleeding
    Emanuel, MH
    Wamsteker, K
    Hart, AAM
    Metz, G
    Lammes, FB
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 93 (05) : 743 - 748
  • [3] Uterine artery embolization for the treatment of uterine leiomyomata midterm results
    Goodwin, SC
    McLucas, B
    Lee, M
    Chen, G
    Perrella, R
    Vedantham, S
    Muir, S
    Lai, A
    Sayre, JW
    DeLeon, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 1999, 10 (09) : 1159 - 1165
  • [4] Selective uterine artery embolization as primary treatment for symptomatic leiomyomata uteri
    Hutchins, FL
    Worthington-Kirsch, R
    Berkowitz, RP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF GYNECOLOGIC LAPAROSCOPISTS, 1999, 6 (03): : 279 - 284
  • [5] Fibroid-related menorrhagia: Treatment with superselective embolization of the uterine arteries and midterm follow-up
    Pelage, JP
    Le Dref, O
    Soyer, P
    Kardache, M
    Dahan, H
    Abitbol, M
    Merland, JJ
    Ravina, JH
    Rymer, R
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2000, 215 (02) : 428 - 431
  • [6] Shwartz M, 1995, INQUIRY-J HEALTH CAR, V32, P476
  • [7] Uterine artery embolization for leiomyomata
    Spies, JB
    Ascher, SA
    Roth, AR
    Kim, J
    Levy, EB
    Gomez-Jorge, J
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 98 (01) : 29 - 34
  • [8] Outcome and resource use associated with myomectomy
    Subramanian, S
    Clark, MA
    Isaacson, K
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 98 (04) : 583 - 587
  • [9] Uterine artery embolization for leiomyomata: Resource use and cost estimation
    Subramanian, S
    Spies, JB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2001, 12 (05) : 571 - 574