Spatial covert attention increases contrast sensitivity across the CSF: support for signal enhancement

被引:380
作者
Carrasco, M
Penpeci-Talgar, C
Eckstein, M
机构
[1] NYU, Dept Psychol, New York, NY 10003 USA
[2] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Med Phys & Imaging, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
关键词
attention mechanisms; contrast sensitivity; covert spatial attention; signal enhancement; external noise reduction; peripheral precue; mask; orientation discrimination; detection; localization;
D O I
10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00024-9
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
This study is the first to report the benefits of spatial covert attention on contrast sensitivity in a wide range of spatial frequencies when a target alone was presented in the absence of a local post-mask. We used a peripheral precue (a small circle indicating the target location) to explore the effects of covert spatial attention on contrast sensitivity as assessed by orientation discrimination (Experiments 1-4), detection (Experiments 2 and 3) and localization (Experiment 3) tasks. In all four experiments the target (a Gabor patch ranging in spatial frequency from 0.5 to 10 cpd) was presented alone in one of eight possible locations equidistant from fixation. Contrast sensitivity was consistently higher for peripherally- than for neutrally-cued trials, even though we eliminated variables (distracters, global masks, local masks, and location uncertainty) that are known to contribute to an external noise reduction explanation of attention. When observers were presented with vertical and horizontal Gabor patches an external noise reduction signal detection model accounted for the cueing benefit in a discrimination task (Experiment 1). However, such a model could not account for this benefit when location uncertainty was reduced, either by: (a) Increasing overall performance level (Experiment 2); (b) increasing stimulus contrast to enable fine discriminations of slightly tilted suprathreshold stimuli (Experiment 3); and (c) presenting a local post-mask (Experiment 4). Given that attentional benefits occurred under conditions that exclude all variables predicted by the external noise reduction model, these results support the signal enhancement model of attention. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1203 / 1215
页数:13
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1986, HDB PERCEPTION PERFO
[2]   The effect of attentional spread on spatial resolution [J].
Balz, GW ;
Hock, HS .
VISION RESEARCH, 1997, 37 (11) :1499-1510
[3]   ENHANCEMENT OF PERCEPTUAL SENSITIVITY AS THE RESULT OF SELECTIVELY ATTENDING TO SPATIAL LOCATIONS [J].
BASHINSKI, HS ;
BACHARACH, VR .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1980, 28 (03) :241-248
[4]   The psychophysics toolbox [J].
Brainard, DH .
SPATIAL VISION, 1997, 10 (04) :433-436
[5]   The contribution of covert attention to the set-size and eccentricity effects in visual search [J].
Carrasco, M ;
Yeshurun, Y .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1998, 24 (02) :673-692
[6]  
Carrasco M, 1999, PERCEPTION, V28, P57
[7]  
CARRASCO M, 1999, INVESTIGATIVE OPHT S, V40, P806
[8]   DETECTABILITY OF A LUMINANCE INCREMENT - EFFECT OF SPATIAL UNCERTAINTY [J].
COHN, TE ;
LASLEY, DJ .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1974, 64 (12) :1715-1721
[9]  
DAVIES GI, 1983, VETUS TESTAMENTUM, V33, P1