A comparative study of skeletal and dental stability between rigid and wire fixation for mandibular advancement

被引:18
作者
Keeling, SD
Dolce, C
Van Sickels, JE
Bays, RA
Clark, GM
Rugh, JD
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Orthodont, JHMHC, Gainesville, FL 32610 USA
[2] Univ Texas, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, San Antonio, TX USA
[3] Emory Univ, Div Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Dept Surg, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[4] Univ Texas, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Med, San Antonio, TX 78284 USA
[5] Univ Texas, Dept Orthodont, San Antonio, TX 78285 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1067/mod.2000.103256
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
This study examined the skeletal and dental stability after mandibular advancement surgery with rigid or wire fixation for up to 2 years after the surgery. Subjects for this multisite, prospective, randomized, clinical trial were assigned to receive rigid (n = 64) or wire (n = 63) fixation. The rigid cases received three 2-mm bicortical position screws bilaterally and elastics; the wire fixation subjects received inferior border wires and 6 weeks of skeletal maxillomandibular fixation with 24-gauge wires. Cephalometric films were obtained before surgery, and at 1 week, 8 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery. Skeletal and dental changes were analyzed using the Johnston's analysis. Before surgery both groups were balanced with respect to linear and angular measurements of craniofacial morphology. Mean anterior advancement of the mandibular symphasis was 5.5 mm (SD, 3.2) in the rigid group and 5.6 mm (SD, 3.0) in the wire group. Two years after surgery, mandibular symphasis was unchanged in the rigid group, whereas the wire group had 26% of sagittal relapse. Dental compensation occurred to maintain the corrected occlusion, with the mandibular incisor moving forward in the wire group and posteriorly in the rigid group. However, at 2 years after surgery, when most subjects were without braces, the overjet and molar discrepancy had relapsed similarly in both groups.
引用
收藏
页码:638 / 649
页数:12
相关论文
共 30 条
[2]  
BEHRMAN SJ, 1972, J ORAL SURG, V30, P554
[3]  
BELL WH, 1980, SURG CORRECTION DENT, P685
[4]   STABILITY AFTER REOPERATION FOR PROGRESSIVE CONDYLAR RESORPTION AFTER ORTHOGNATHIC SURGERY - REPORT OF 7 CASES [J].
CRAWFORD, JG ;
STOELINGA, PJW ;
BLIJDORP, PA ;
BROUNS, JJA .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1994, 52 (05) :460-466
[5]  
DYSENCK H, 1968, MANUAL EYSENCK PERSO
[6]   RELAPSE FOLLOWING MANDIBULAR ADVANCEMENT WITH DENTAL PLUS SKELETAL MAXILLOMANDIBULAR FIXATION [J].
ELLIS, E ;
GALLO, WJ .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1986, 44 (07) :509-515
[7]  
Feussner JR, 1996, J BONE MINER RES, V11, P877
[8]  
JACOBSON A, 1988, ANGLE ORTHOD, V58, P205
[9]  
Keeling S D, 1993, Br J Orthod, V20, P101
[10]   SKELETAL STABILITY FOLLOWING MANDIBULAR ADVANCEMENT AND RIGID FIXATION [J].
KIRKPATRICK, TB ;
WOODS, MG ;
SWIFT, JQ ;
MARKOWITZ, NR .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 1987, 45 (07) :572-576