Survival rate and fracture strength of incisors restored with different post and core systems and endodontically treated incisors without coronoradicular reinforcement

被引:92
作者
Pontius, O
Hutter, JW
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Goldman Sch Grad Dent, Postdoctoral Program Endodont, Dept Endodont, Boston, MA 02118 USA
[2] Boston Univ, Goldman Sch Grad Dent, Adv Specialty Educ Program, Boston, MA 02118 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00004770-200210000-00008
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
This in vitro study evaluated the survival rate and fracture resistance of maxillary central incisors restored with different post and core systems. The post and core systems investigated were a prefabricated high precious metal post with cast core (group A), zirconia post with a prefabricated bonded ceramic core (group B), and a resin-ceramic interpenetrating phase composite post (experimental) with a prefabricated bonded ceramic core (group C). The all-ceramic copings were cemented using Panavia 21 TC. In the group without coronoradicular reinforcement, the access cavity was closed with a light-cured composite in combination with a dentine-bonding agent (group D). Each specimen was intermittently loaded and thermocycled before final stress tests in a Zwick machine. The survival rates after 1,200,000 cycles in the artificial mouth were 90% (group A), 80% (group B), 60% (group C), and 100% (group D). Statistically significant differences were found between all groups with the exception of A and 13, when failure during cyclic loading was included (Kruskal-Wallis multiple comparisons test). Samples restored with a cast post and core demonstrated more vertical root fractures. It was concluded that the preservation of both internal and external tooth structure is of utmost importance when restoring endodontically treated teeth.
引用
收藏
页码:710 / 715
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   PHOTOELASTIC ANALYSIS OF STRESS TRANSFER BY ENDODONTICALLY TREATED TEETH TO THE SUPPORTING STRUCTURE USING DIFFERENT RESTORATIVE TECHNIQUES [J].
ASSIF, D ;
OREN, E ;
MARSHAK, BL ;
AVIV, I .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1989, 61 (05) :535-543
[2]  
Dietschi D, 1997, INT J PROSTHODONT, V10, P498
[3]   THE DENTIN-ROOT COMPLEX - ANATOMIC AND BIOLOGIC CONSIDERATIONS IN RESTORING ENDODONTICALLY TREATED TEETH [J].
GUTMANN, JL .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1992, 67 (04) :458-467
[4]   INVITRO COMPARISON OF INTACT ENDODONTICALLY TREATED TEETH WITH AND WITHOUT ENDO-POST REINFORCEMENT [J].
GUZY, GE ;
NICHOLLS, JI .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1979, 42 (01) :39-44
[5]  
HELFER AR, 1972, ORAL SURG, V34, P662
[6]   EFFECTS OF MOISTURE-CONTENT AND ENDODONTIC TREATMENT ON SOME MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES OF HUMAN DENTIN [J].
HUANG, TJG ;
SCHILDER, H ;
NATHANSON, D .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 1992, 18 (05) :209-215
[7]  
KAELIN D, 1991, SCHWEIZ MONATSSCHR Z, V101, P457
[8]   COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF RESTORATIVE TECHNIQUES FOR PULPLESS TEETH [J].
KANTOR, ME ;
PINES, MS .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1977, 38 (04) :405-412
[9]  
Kern M, 1998, DTSCH ZAHNARZTL Z, V53, P266
[10]   AN INVITRO EVALUATION OF A PROTOTYPE CFRC PREFABRICATED POST DEVELOPED FOR THE RESTORATION OF PULPLESS TEETH [J].
KING, PA ;
SETCHELL, DJ .
JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 1990, 17 (06) :599-609