Isolated Impaired Fasting Glucose and Peripheral Insulin Sensitivity Not a simple relationship

被引:42
作者
Kim, Sun H. [1 ]
Reaven, Gerald M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Med, Sch Med, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE; DIABETES-MELLITUS; SUPPRESSION TEST; TOLERANCE; RESISTANCE; SECRETION; DISPOSAL; RISK; INDIVIDUALS; PREDICTOR;
D O I
10.2337/dc07-1574
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE - In a recent consensus statement, the American Diabetes Association (ADA) concluded that individuals With impaired fasting glucose (IFG) have "normal muscle insulin sensitivity." To subject this conclusion to further validation, we evaluated the relationship between glucose tolerance categories and peripheral insulin sensitivity in a large nondiabetic population. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - insulin sensitivity was directly quantified by determining the steady-state plasma glucose (SSPG) concentration during an insulin suppression test in 446 nondiabetic individuals divided into four groups: normal glucose tolerance (NGT, n = 318), isolated IFG (n = 63), isolated impaired glucose tolerance (IGT, n = 33), and combined IFG and IGT (IFG/IGT, n = 32). RESULTS - insulin sensitivity was significantly different in all three groups with pre-diabetes (IFG, IGT, IFG/IGT) as compared with NGT (P < 0.05). Using tertiles of SSPG concentration in the NGT group as operational definitions of insulin resistance (highest tertile) and insulin sensitivity (lowest tertile), there was considerable heterogeneity within the pre-diabetic groups. Thus, 57% of IFG individuals were insulin resistant, and 13% were insulin sensitive. The IFG/IGT group Was Most homogeneous, with 94% classified as insulin resistant and only 3% as insulin sensitive. CONCLUSIONS - Peripheral insulin sensitivity varies considerably in nondiabetic individuals, with IFG individuals showing the most heterogeneity within the pre-diabetes group. We believe that this heterogeneity in insulin sensitivity, and the relatively few Patients in whom insulin sensitivity has been measured directly, in the past, explain the discrepancy between our findings and those of the recent ADA consensus statement.
引用
收藏
页码:347 / 352
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Insulin secretion and action in subjects with impaired fasting glucose and impaired glucose tolerance - Results from the veterans administration genetic epidemiology study [J].
Abdul-Ghani, MA ;
Jenkinson, CP ;
Richardson, DK ;
Tripathy, D ;
DeFronzo, RA .
DIABETES, 2006, 55 (05) :1430-1435
[2]  
Bland JM, 1996, BRIT MED J, V312, P1079
[3]   Impaired glucose tolerance and fasting hyperglycaemia have different characteristics [J].
Davies, MJ ;
Raymond, NT ;
Day, JL ;
Hales, CN ;
Burden, AC .
DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2000, 17 (06) :433-440
[4]   Insulin resistance as a predictor of age-related diseases [J].
Facchini, FS ;
Hua, N ;
Abbasi, F ;
Raven, GM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2001, 86 (08) :3574-3578
[5]   Differences in insulin resistance in nondiabetic subjects with isolated impaired glucose tolerance or isolated impaired fasting glucose [J].
Festa, A ;
D'Agostino, R ;
Hanley, AJG ;
Karter, AJ ;
Saad, MF ;
Haffner, SM .
DIABETES, 2004, 53 (06) :1549-1555
[6]  
Gavin JR, 1997, DIABETES CARE, V20, P1183
[7]  
Genuth S, 2003, DIABETES CARE, V26, P3160
[8]   ASSESSMENT OF INSULIN RESISTANCE WITH THE INSULIN SUPPRESSION TEST AND THE EUGLYCEMIC CLAMP [J].
GREENFIELD, MS ;
DOBERNE, L ;
KRAEMER, F ;
TOBEY, T ;
REAVEN, G .
DIABETES, 1981, 30 (05) :387-392
[9]   Insulin secretion and insulin sensitivity pattern is different in isolated impaired glucose tolerance and impaired fasting glucose - The risk factor in impaired glucose tolerance for atherosclerosis and diabetes study [J].
Hanefeld, M ;
Koehler, C ;
Fuecker, K ;
Henkel, E ;
Schaper, F ;
Temelkova-Kurktschiev, T .
DIABETES CARE, 2003, 26 (03) :868-874
[10]   HOMEOSTASIS MODEL ASSESSMENT - INSULIN RESISTANCE AND BETA-CELL FUNCTION FROM FASTING PLASMA-GLUCOSE AND INSULIN CONCENTRATIONS IN MAN [J].
MATTHEWS, DR ;
HOSKER, JP ;
RUDENSKI, AS ;
NAYLOR, BA ;
TREACHER, DF ;
TURNER, RC .
DIABETOLOGIA, 1985, 28 (07) :412-419