What do we measure by co-authorships?

被引：272

作者：

Laudel, G ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Australian Natl Univ, Res Sch Social Sci, Res Evaluat & Policy Project, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia

来源：

RESEARCH EVALUATION | 2002年 / 11卷 / 01期

关键词：

D O I：

10.3152/147154402781776961

中图分类号：

G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];

学科分类号：

1205 ; 120501 ;

摘要：

Interviews with scientists about the content and reward of collaborations, and classification of contributions of co-authors and scientists cited in acknowledgements, identified six types of research collaborations with distinct patterns of rewards; showed that about half of the collaborations are invisible in formal communication channels because they are not rewarded, and showed that about one third of the collaborations are rewarded only by acknowledgements.

引用

页码：3 / 15

页数：13

共 36 条

[1]

[Anonymous], 1973, THEORY THEORY GROUPS

[2]

Beaver D. deB., 1978, Scientometrics, V1, P65, DOI 10.1007/BF02016840

[3] STUDIES IN SCIENTIFIC COLLABORATION .3. PROFESSIONALIZATION AND THE NATURAL-HISTORY OF MODERN SCIENTIFIC CO-AUTHORSHIP [J].