Social housing and planning gain: is this an appropriate way of providing affordable housing?

被引:35
作者
Crook, ADH [1 ]
Whitehead, CME
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Dept Town & Reg Planning, Sheffield S10 2TN, S Yorkshire, England
[2] London Sch Econ, Dept Econ, London WC2 2AE, England
关键词
D O I
10.1068/a34135
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The current mechanism for providing affordable housing through the planning system in England is based on negotiation within the framework of Planning Policy Guidance Note 3 and Circular 6/98. In this paper the authors examine three groups of questions. First, on the development of the policy, they look at how the need for affordable housing is assessed, how the policy evolved, and how it is currently operated. Second, on the principles and potential outputs of the policy they took at how the approach fits into the principles of betterment taxation, what the results are likely to be 'on the ground' in terms of price and output of housing, and whether these are consistent with taxation principles. Third, they examine what the evidence is so far on the impact of planning obligations on affordable housing provision. Finally, the authors develop a typology of likely outcomes, particularly regarding who pays for affordable housing.
引用
收藏
页码:1259 / 1279
页数:21
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, On the move: The housing consequences of migration
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Housing demand and need in England 1991-2011
[3]  
Barlow J, 1992, Planning Agreements and Affordable Housing Provision
[4]  
BARLOW J, 1994, PLANNING AFFORDABLE
[5]  
BIBBY PR, 1996, URBANIZATION ENGLAND
[6]  
BOOTH PA, 1992, LOW COST HOME OWNERS
[7]  
BRAMLEY G, 1998, ROOF NOV, P23
[8]  
Bramley G., 2000, LOW DEMAND HOUSING U
[9]   Planning obligations, planning practice, and land-use outcomes [J].
Campbell, H ;
Ellis, N ;
Henneberry, J ;
Gladwell, C .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING B-PLANNING & DESIGN, 2000, 27 (05) :759-775
[10]  
*CIH, 1999, RESP ENV TRANSP REG