Gender equality in the work of local research ethics committees in Europe:: a study of practice in five countries

被引:7
作者
Moerman, C. J.
Haafkens, J. A.
Soderstrom, M.
Rasky, E.
Maguire, P.
Maschewsky-Schneider, U.
Norstedt, M.
Hahn, D
Reinerth, H.
McKevitt, N.
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Gen Practice, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Lund Univ, Dept Med, Inst Social Med & Epidemiol, Lund, Sweden
[3] European Inst Womens Hlth, Dublin, Ireland
[4] Tech Univ Berlin, Berlin Ctr Publ Hlth, Berlin, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1136/jme.2005.015206
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Funding organisations and research ethics committees (RECs) should play a part in strengthening attention to gender equality in clinical research. In the research policy of European Union (EU), funding measures have been taken to realise this, but such measures are lacking in the EU policy regarding RECs. Objective: To explore how RECs in Austria, Germany, Ireland, The Netherlands and Sweden deal with gender equality issues by asking two questions: ( 1) Do existing procedures promote representation of women and gender expertise in the committee? ( 2) How are sex and gender issues dealt with in protocol evaluation? Methods: Two RECs were selected from each country. Data were obtained through interviews with key informants and content analysis of relevant documents ( regulations, guidelines and review tools in use in 2003). Results: All countries have rules ( mostly informal) to ensure the presence of women on RECs; gender expertise is not required. Drug study protocols are carefully evaluated, sometimes on a formal basis, as regards the inclusion of women of childbearing age. The reason for excluding either one of the sexes or including specific groups of women or making a gender-specific risk - benefit analysis are investigated by some RECs. Such measures are, however, neither defined in the regulations nor integrated in review tools. Conclusions: The RECs investigated in five European member states are found to pay limited attention to gender equality in their working methods and, in particular in protocol evaluation. Policy and regulations of EU are needed to strengthen attention to gender equality in the work of RECs.
引用
收藏
页码:107 / 112
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
*AMG, 2004, BURD JAHRG 2004 1, P2031
[2]  
Annandale E., 2000, GENDER INEQUALITIES
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2001, J WOMEN HEALTH GEN-B, V10, P433
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2005, TRIC POL STAT ETH CO
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Int Conf Harmon, V1994, P17, DOI DOI 10.1201/9781482298468
[6]  
[Anonymous], VAD GEND MAINSTR 6 F
[7]  
Beauchamp TL, 2001, Principles of biomedical ethics, V5th
[8]   Strategies and methods for research on sex differences in brain and behavior [J].
Becker, JB ;
Arnold, AP ;
Berkley, KJ ;
Blaustein, JD ;
Eckel, LA ;
Hampson, E ;
Herman, JP ;
Marts, S ;
Sadee, W ;
Steiner, M ;
Taylor, J ;
Young, E .
ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2005, 146 (04) :1650-1673
[9]  
Bekker MHJ., 2003, PSYCHOL HEALTH MED, V8, P231, DOI DOI 10.1080/1354850031000087618
[10]   Gender matters: an integrated model for understanding men's and women's health [J].
Bird, CE ;
Rieker, PP .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1999, 48 (06) :745-755