Robotic Arm-assisted UKA Improves Tibial Component Alignment A Pilot Study

被引:184
作者
Lonner, Jess H. [1 ]
John, Thomas K. [2 ]
Conditt, Michael A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Penn Hosp, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
[2] Albert Einstein Med Ctr, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Philadelphia, PA 19141 USA
[3] Mako Surg Corp, Clin Res, Ft Lauderdale, FL USA
关键词
UNICOMPARTMENTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; UNICONDYLAR ARTHROPLASTY; UNITED-STATES; IMPLANT; REPLACEMENT; PATIENT;
D O I
10.1007/s11999-009-0977-5
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
100224 [整形外科学];
摘要
The alignment of the components of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) reportedly influences outcomes and durability. A novel robotic arm technology has been developed with the expectation that it could improve the accuracy of bone preparation in UKA. During the study period, we compared the postoperative radiographic alignment of the tibial component with the preoperatively planned position in 31 knees in 31 consecutive patients undergoing UKA using robotic arm-assisted bone preparation and in 27 consecutive patients who underwent unilateral UKA using conventional manual instrumentation to determine the error of bone preparation and variance with each technique. Radiographically, the root mean square error of the posterior tibial slope was 3.1 degrees when using manual techniques compared with 1.9 degrees when using robotic arm assistance for bone preparation. In addition, the variance using manual instruments was 2.6 times greater than the robotically guided procedures. In the coronal plane, the average error was 2.7 degrees +/- 2.1 degrees more varus of the tibial component relative to the mechanical axis of the tibia using manual instruments compared with 0.2 degrees +/- 1.8 degrees with robotic technology, and the varus/valgus root mean square error was 3.4 degrees manually compared with 1.8 degrees robotically. Further study will be necessary to determine whether a reduction in alignment errors of these magnitudes will ultimately influence implant function or survival.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 146
页数:6
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]
Berend K R., 2005, Clin Orthop Relat Res, V435, P171
[2]
Berend KR, 2007, ORTHOPEDICS, V30, pS19
[3]
Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty [J].
Borus, Todd ;
Thornhill, Thomas .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2008, 16 (01) :9-18
[4]
Hands-on robotic unicompartmental knee replacement - A prospective, randomised controlled study of the Acrobot system [J].
Cobb, J ;
Henckel, J ;
Gomes, P ;
Harris, S ;
Jakopec, M ;
Rodriguez y Baena, F ;
Barrett, A ;
Davies, B .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2006, 88B (02) :188-197
[5]
Patient, implant, and alignment factors associated with revision of medial compartment unicondylar arthroplasty [J].
Collier, Matthew B. ;
Eickmann, Thomas H. ;
Sukezaki, Fumio ;
McAuley, James P. ;
Engh, Gerard A. .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2006, 21 (06) :108-115
[6]
Implant position in knee surgery - A comparison of minimally invasive, open unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty [J].
Fisher, DA ;
Watts, M ;
Davis, KE .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2003, 18 (07) :2-8
[7]
Incidence and reasons for reoperation after minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty [J].
Hamilton, William G. ;
Collier, Matthew B. ;
Tarabee, Eshan ;
McAuley, James P. ;
Engh, C. Anderson, Jr. ;
Engh, Gerard A. .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2006, 21 (06) :98-107
[8]
Alignment influences wear in the knee after medial unicompartmental arthroplasty [J].
Hernigou, P ;
Deschamps, G .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2004, (423) :161-165
[9]
Posterior slope of the tibial implant and the outcome of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty [J].
Hernigou, P ;
Deschamps, G .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2004, 86A (03) :506-511
[10]
Limb alignment in computer-assisted minimally-invasive unicompartmental knee replacement [J].
Keene, G ;
Simpson, D ;
Kalairajah, Y .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2006, 88B (01) :44-48