Dimensions of social status in preadolescent peer groups: Likability, perceived popularity, and social dominance

被引:170
作者
Lease, AM
Musgrove, KT
Axelrod, JL
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Dept Educ Psychol, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[2] Univ Maryland, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
关键词
perceived popularity; social status; dominance; peer relations;
D O I
10.1111/1467-9507.00213
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
A multidimensional, interdisciplinary model of social status was developed and examined in a sample of 487 fourth, fifth, and sixth grade elementary school students. Participants were clustered into seven subtypes (i.e., High Status, Perceived Popular/Dominant, Well-Liked/Dominant, Average, Low Dominant/Unpopular, Disliked, and Low Status) based on the dimensions of likability, perceived popularity, and social dominance emphasized, respectively, by psychologists working within the sociometric tradition, sociologists of education, and ethologists. The meaningfulness of the cluster solution was supported by cluster differences on peer-reported social prerogatives of status (e.g., admiration, social control, leadership) and self-reported social characteristics. Furthermore, each cluster had a distinct behavioral profile. It was argued that a broader, multidisciplinary conceptualization of social status should lead to a better understanding of the complex dynamics present in children's peer groups in middle childhood as well as the tools preadolescents need to successfully navigate the peer system.
引用
收藏
页码:508 / 533
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Adler P.A., 1998, Peer power: Preadolescent culture and identity
[2]  
[Anonymous], DEV CHILDRENS FRIENS
[3]   Varieties of childhood bullying: Values, emotion processes, and social competence [J].
Arsenio, WF ;
Lemerise, EA .
SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT, 2001, 10 (01) :59-73
[4]  
AXELROD JL, 2000, THESIS U GEORGIA ATH
[5]   A person-oriented approach in research on developmental psychopathology [J].
Bergman, LR ;
Magnusson, D .
DEVELOPMENT AND PSYCHOPATHOLOGY, 1997, 9 (02) :291-319
[6]   CHARACTERISTICS OF AGGRESSIVE-REJECTED, AGGRESSIVE (NONREJECTED), AND REJECTED (NONAGGRESSIVE) BOYS [J].
BIERMAN, KL ;
SMOOT, DL ;
AUMILLER, K .
CHILD DEVELOPMENT, 1993, 64 (01) :139-151
[7]  
Blashfield RK., 1988, Handbook of Multivariate Experimental Psychology, V2nd, P447, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4613-0893-5_14
[8]  
BRIDGER RC, 1998, THESIS U GEORGIA ATH
[9]  
Bukowski W M, 2000, New Dir Child Adolesc Dev, P11
[10]  
Bukowski W.M., 1989, Peer relations in child development, P15