Current trends in lead discovery: Are we looking for the appropriate properties?

被引:146
作者
Oprea, TI
机构
[1] Univ New Mexico, Sch Med, Dept Biochem & Mol Biol, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
[2] Univ New Mexico, Sch Med, Off Biocomp, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
关键词
database filtering; drug-likeness; drug research; hydrophobicity; lead-likeness; property distribution; 'rule of 5 test'; solubility;
D O I
10.1023/A:1020877402759
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The new drug disc very paradigm is based on high-throughput technologies, both with respect to synthesis and screening. The progression HTS hits --> lead series --> candidate drug marketed drug appears to indicate that the probability of reaching launched status is one in a million. This has shifted the focus from good quality candidate drugs to good quality leads. We examined the current trends in lead discovery by comparing MW ( molecular weight), LogP (octanol/water partition coefficient, estimated by Kowwin [17]) and LogSw ( intrinsic water solubility, estimated by Wskowwin [18]) for the following categories: 62 leads and 75 drugs [ 11]; compounds in the development phase (I, II, III and launched), as indexed in MDDR; and compounds indexed in medicinal chemistry journals [ref. 20], categorized according to their biological activity. Comparing the distribution of the above properties, the 62 lead structures show the lowest median with respect to MW (smaller) and LogP (less hydrophobic), and the highest median with respect to LogSw (more soluble). By contrast, over 50% of the medicinal chemistry compounds with activities above 1 nanomolar have MW > 425, LogP > 4.25 and LogSw < - 4.75, indicating that the reported active compounds are larger, more hydrophobic and less soluble when compared to time-tested quality leads. In the MDDR set, a progressive constraint to reduce MW and LogP, and to increase LogSw, can be observed when examining trends in the developmental sequence: phase I, II, III and launched drugs. These trends indicate that other properties besides binding affinity, e.g., solubility and hydrophobicity, need to be considered when choosing the appropriate leads.
引用
收藏
页码:325 / 334
页数:10
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
BOYD D.B., 1998, RATIONAL MOL DESIGN, P15
[2]  
de Stevens G, 1986, Prog Drug Res, V30, P189
[3]   Innovation deficit revisited: reflections on the productivity of pharmaceutical R&D [J].
Drews, J .
DRUG DISCOVERY TODAY, 1998, 3 (11) :491-494
[4]   High throughput screening for drug discovery: Continually transitioning into new technology [J].
Fox, S ;
Farr-Jones, S ;
Yund, MA .
JOURNAL OF BIOMOLECULAR SCREENING, 1999, 4 (04) :183-186
[5]   Molecular complexity and its impact on the probability of finding leads for drug discovery [J].
Hann, MM ;
Leach, AR ;
Harper, G .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND COMPUTER SCIENCES, 2001, 41 (03) :856-864
[6]   Innovation in the pharmaceutical industry [J].
Horrobin, DF .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE, 2000, 93 (07) :341-345
[7]   Managing the drug discovery/development interface [J].
Kennedy, T .
DRUG DISCOVERY TODAY, 1997, 2 (10) :436-444
[8]   The maximal affinity of ligands [J].
Kuntz, ID ;
Chen, K ;
Sharp, KA ;
Kollman, PA .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1999, 96 (18) :9997-10002
[9]   Parallel personal comments on "classical" papers in combinatorial chemistry [J].
Lebl, M .
JOURNAL OF COMBINATORIAL CHEMISTRY, 1999, 1 (01) :3-24
[10]   Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings [J].
Lipinski, CA ;
Lombardo, F ;
Dominy, BW ;
Feeney, PJ .
ADVANCED DRUG DELIVERY REVIEWS, 1997, 23 (1-3) :3-25