Phase I study of concomitant gemcitabine and IMRT for patients with unresectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head

被引:46
作者
Crane, CH
Antolak, JA
Rosen, II
Forster, KM
Evans, DB
Janjan, NA
Charnsangavej, C
Pisters, PWT
Lenzi, R
Papagikos, MA
Wolff, RA
机构
[1] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Phys, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Gastrointestinal Med Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Surg Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[5] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Expt Radiat Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[6] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Pancreat Tumor Study Grp, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
IMRT; pancreatic cancer; radiotherapy; gemcitabine; conformal;
D O I
10.1385/IJGC:30:3:123
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: We hypothesized that dynamic intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) would protect normal tissues enough to allow the escalation of either the gemcitabine or radiotherapy dose in unresectable pancreatic cancer patients. Methods and Materials: The trial was designed to build on a previous phase I trial that determined the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of gemcitabine (350 mg/m(2)) with concurrent radiotherapy (30 Gy/10 fractions). Only patients with unresectable disease based on established criteria were eligible. The plan was to alternate escalating the radiation dose by 3 Gy and the gemcitabine dose by 50 mg/m(2). The starting dose of gemcitabine was 350 mg/m(2) and 33 Gy/11 fractions of IMRT to the regional lymphatics and primary disease. The NCI Common Toxicity Criteria were used for dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Results: All three patients in the first cohort treated suffered DLT. Therefore, a second cohort of patients received a lower gemcitabine dose (250 mg/m(2)). Both patients treated at this dose level experienced DLT. The DLTs were all due to myelosuppression and upper gastrointestinal toxicity. All patients required a gemcitabine dose reduction. Also, four patients required hospital admission for supportive care, while the fifth died of an unrelated cause shortly after completing therapy. The trial was then closed due to excessive toxicity. Conclusion: Hypofractionated dynamic IMRT to the primary site and regional lymphatics did not permit escalation of either the radiation or gemcitabine dose. Dynamic IMRT requires further investigation before it can be applied to toxic combinations of chemotherapy and radiation in the upper abdomen.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 132
页数:10
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] A PHASE-I CLINICAL, PLASMA, AND CELLULAR PHARMACOLOGY STUDY OF GEMCITABINE
    ABBRUZZESE, JL
    GRUNEWALD, R
    WEEKS, EA
    GRAVEL, D
    ADAMS, T
    NOWAK, B
    MINEISHI, S
    TARASSOFF, P
    SATTERLEE, W
    RABER, MN
    PLUNKETT, W
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1991, 9 (03) : 491 - 498
  • [2] Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: A randomized trial
    Burris, HA
    Moore, MJ
    Andersen, J
    Green, MR
    Rothenberg, ML
    Madiano, MR
    Cripps, MC
    Portenoy, RK
    Storniolo, AM
    Tarassoff, P
    Nelson, R
    Dorr, FA
    Stephens, CD
    VanHoff, DD
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1997, 15 (06) : 2403 - 2413
  • [3] PHASE-II TRIAL OF GEMCITABINE (2,2'-DIFLUORODEOXYCYTIDINE) IN PATIENTS WITH ADENOCARCINOMA OF THE PANCREAS
    CASPER, ES
    GREEN, MR
    KELSEN, DP
    HEELAN, RT
    BROWN, TD
    FLOMBAUM, CD
    TROCHANOWSKI, B
    TARASSOFF, PG
    [J]. INVESTIGATIONAL NEW DRUGS, 1994, 12 (01) : 29 - 34
  • [4] Comparison of radiation side-effects of conformal and conventional radiotherapy in prostate cancer: a randomised trial
    Dearnaley, DP
    Khoo, VS
    Norman, AR
    Meyer, L
    Nahum, A
    Tait, D
    Yarnold, J
    Horwich, A
    [J]. LANCET, 1999, 353 (9149) : 267 - 272
  • [5] HIGH-DOSE PREOPERATIVE EXTERNAL-BEAM AND INTRAOPERATIVE IRRADIATION FOR LOCALLY ADVANCED PANCREATIC-CANCER
    GARTON, GR
    GUNDERSON, LL
    NAGORNEY, DM
    DONOHUE, JH
    MARTIN, JK
    MCILRATH, DC
    CHA, SS
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1993, 27 (05): : 1153 - 1157
  • [6] INTRAOPERATIVE AND EXTERNAL BEAM IRRADIATION +/- 5-FU FOR LOCALLY ADVANCED PANCREATIC-CANCER
    GUNDERSON, LL
    MARTIN, JK
    KVOLS, LK
    NAGORNEY, DM
    FIECK, JM
    WIEAND, HS
    MARTINEZ, A
    OCONNELL, MJ
    EARLE, JD
    MCILRATH, DC
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1987, 13 (03): : 319 - 329
  • [7] 3-DIMENSIONAL CONFORMAL PANCREAS TREATMENT - COMPARISON OF 4-FIELD TO 6-FIELD TECHNIQUES
    HIGGINS, PD
    SOHN, JW
    FINE, RM
    SCHELL, MC
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1995, 31 (03): : 605 - 609
  • [8] HITTELMAN W, 1996, P ANN M AM ASS CANC, V37, pA1973
  • [9] Acute morbidity reduction using 3DCRT for prostate carcinoma: A randomized study
    Koper, PCM
    Stroom, JC
    van Putten, WLJ
    Korevaar, GA
    Heijmen, BJM
    Wijnmaalen, A
    Jansen, PP
    Hanssens, PEJ
    Griep, C
    Krol, ADG
    Samson, MJ
    Levendag, PC
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1999, 43 (04): : 727 - 734
  • [10] Maximizing therapeutic gain with gemcitabine and fractionated radiation
    Mason, KA
    Milas, L
    Hunter, NR
    Elshaikh, M
    Buchmiller, L
    Kishi, K
    Hittelman, KW
    Ang, KK
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1999, 44 (05): : 1125 - 1135