The changes in coagulation profile and epidural catheter safety for living liver donors: a report on 6 years of our experience

被引:42
作者
Choi, Soo Joo
Gwak, Mi Sook [1 ]
Ko, Justin Sang
Kim, Gaab Soo
Ahn, Hyun Joo
Yang, Mikyung
Hahm, Tae Soo
Lee, Sang Min
Kim, Myung Hee
Joh, Jae Won
机构
[1] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, Samsung Med Ctr, Seoul 135710, South Korea
[2] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Samsung Med Ctr, Seoul 135710, South Korea
关键词
D O I
10.1002/lt.20933
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
The use of epidural catheters has been a subject of active debate in living liver donors because of the possible postoperative coagulation derangement and the subsequent risk of epidural hematoma. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of epidural catheters in relation to the changes in coagulation profile based on a review of previously published literature and the results of our 360 donors. In both the literature and in our cases, platelet count, prothrombin time (PT), and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) in cases of heparin administration showed significant changes (P < 0.05), especially after right lobectomy. Platelet count reached its nadir on postoperative day (POD) 2-3, while PT and aPTT reached their peaks on POD 1-2 and at the end of the operation, respectively. In our donors, the ranges of platelet count, PT, and aPTT for the first 3 PODs were 54-359 X 10(3)/mu L, 0.99-2.38 international normalized ratio (INR), and 25.9-300 seconds, respectively, and of note, 5 donors (1.4%) had a platelet count of <80 x 10(3)/mu L and 9 donors (2.5%) had a PT of >2.0 INR. Epidural catheterizations were performed in 242 donors, and the catheters were removed on POD 3-4 in 177 donors (73.1%). Mean (range) of platelet count, PT, and aPTT on the day of catheter removal were 168.4 +/- 42.9 (82-307) x 10(3)/mu L, 1.33 +/- 0.18 (0.99-1.93) INR, and 40.9 +/- 4.8 (32.0-70.6) seconds, respectively. No epidural hematoma was observed in this study. In conclusion, the discreet use of epidural catheters in live liver donors, in spite of postoperative coagulation derangements, appears to be safe regardless of the type of hepatectomy performed.
引用
收藏
页码:62 / 70
页数:9
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Anesthetic risks for donors in living-related liver transplantation:: analysis of 30 cases [J].
Akpek, EA ;
Arslan, G ;
Erkaya, Ç ;
Torgay, A ;
Dönmez, A ;
Kayhan, Z ;
Karakayali, H .
TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 16 (08) :584-588
[2]  
BARASH PG, 2006, CLIN ANESTH, P713
[3]   Living liver donor surgery: Report of initial anesthesia experience [J].
Beebe, DS ;
Carr, R ;
Komanduri, V ;
Humar, A ;
Gruessner, R ;
Belani, KG .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2000, 12 (02) :157-161
[4]   Epidural catheter and increased prothrombin time after right lobe hepatectomy for living donor transplantation [J].
Borromeo, CJ ;
Stix, MS ;
Lally, A ;
Pomfret, EA .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2000, 91 (05) :1139-1141
[5]  
Cabrera A, 2002, Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim, V49, P272
[6]   Anaesthetic management and outcome in right-lobe living liver-donor surgery [J].
Cammu, G ;
Troisi, R ;
Cuomo, O ;
de Hemptinne, B ;
Di Florio, E ;
Mortier, E .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2002, 19 (02) :93-98
[7]   Thromboelastogram monitoring in the perioperative period of hepatectomy for adult living liver donation [J].
Cerutti, E ;
Stratta, C ;
Romagnoli, R ;
Schellino, MM ;
Skurzak, S ;
Rizzetto, M ;
Tamponi, G ;
Salizzoni, M .
LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 10 (02) :289-294
[8]   Anesthetic management of living liver donors [J].
Choudhry, DK ;
Schwartz, RE ;
Stayer, SA ;
Shevchenko, Y ;
Rehman, M .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1999, 46 (08) :788-791
[9]   A comparison of postoperative pain control in patients after right lobe donor hepatectomy and major hepatic resection for tumor [J].
Cywinski, JB ;
Parker, BM ;
Meng, X ;
Irefin, SA .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2004, 99 (06) :1747-1752
[10]   Epidural analgesia in gastrointestinal surgery [J].
Fotiadis, RJ ;
Badvie, S ;
Weston, MD ;
Allen-Mersh, TG .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2004, 91 (07) :828-841