Sensitivity of routine system for reporting patient safety incidents in an NHS hospital: retrospective patient case note review

被引:268
作者
Sari, Ali Baba-Akbari
Sheldon, Trevor A. [1 ]
Cracknell, Alison
Turnbull, Alastair
机构
[1] Univ York, Dept Hlth Sci, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
[2] Gen Infirm, Leeds LS1 3EX, W Yorkshire, England
[3] York Hosp, York YO31 8HE, N Yorkshire, England
来源
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2007年 / 334卷 / 7584期
关键词
D O I
10.1136/bmj.39031.507153.AE
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective To evaluate the performance of a routine incident reporting system in identifying patient safety incidents. Design Two stage retrospective review of patients' case notes and analysis of data submitted to the routine incident reporting system on the same patients. Setting A large NHS hospital in England. Population 1006 hospital admissions between January and May 2004: surgery (n=311), general medicine (n=251), elderly care (n=184), orthopaedics (n=131), urology (n=61), and three other specialties (n=68). Main outcome measures Proportion of admissions with at least one patient safety incident; proportion and type of patient safety incidents missed by routine incident reporting and case note review methods. Results 324 patient safety incidents were identified in 230/1006 admissions (22.9%; 95% confidence interval 20.3% to 25.5%). 270 (83%) patient safety incidents were identified by case note review only, 21 (7%) by the routine reporting system only, and 33 (100%) by both methods. 110 admissions (10.9%; 9.0% to 12.8%) had at least one patient safety incident resulting in patient harm, all of which were detected by the case note review and six (5%) by the reporting system. Conclusion The routine incident reporting system may be poor at identifying patient safety incidents, particularly those resulting in harm. Structured case note review may have a useful role in surveillance of routine incident reporting and associated quality improvement programmes.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 81
页数:3
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Clinical risk management
[2]   The Canadian Adverse Events Study:: the incidence of adverse events among hospital patients in Canada [J].
Baker, GR ;
Norton, PG ;
Flintoft, V ;
Blais, R ;
Brown, A ;
Cox, J ;
Etchells, E ;
Ghali, WA ;
Hébert, P ;
Majumdar, SR ;
O'Beirne, M ;
Palacios-Derflingher, L ;
Reid, RJ ;
Sheps, S ;
Tamblyn, R .
CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2004, 170 (11) :1678-1686
[3]   INCIDENCE OF ADVERSE EVENTS AND NEGLIGENCE IN HOSPITALIZED-PATIENTS - RESULTS OF THE HARVARD MEDICAL-PRACTICE STUDY-I [J].
BRENNAN, TA ;
LEAPE, LL ;
LAIRD, NM ;
HEBERT, L ;
LOCALIO, AR ;
LAWTHERS, AG ;
NEWHOUSE, JP ;
WEILER, PC ;
HIATT, HH .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1991, 324 (06) :370-376
[4]  
Campbell MJ., 1999, MED STAT COMMONSENSE, V3rd
[5]  
Davis Peter, 2002, N Z Med J, V115, pU271
[6]   Attitudes and barriers to incident reporting: a collaborative hospital study [J].
Evans, SM ;
Berry, JG ;
Smith, BJ ;
Esterman, A ;
Selim, P ;
O'Shaughnessy, J ;
DeWit, M .
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2006, 15 (01) :39-43
[7]   Barriers to incident reporting [J].
Firth-Cozens, J .
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2002, 11 (01) :7-7
[8]   Automated surveillance for adverse events in hospitalized patients: back to the future [J].
Kilbridge, P. M. ;
Classen, D. C. .
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2006, 15 (03) :148-149
[9]   Attitudes of doctors and nurses towards incident reporting: a qualitative analysis [J].
Kingston, MJ ;
Evans, SM ;
Smith, BJ ;
Berry, JG .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2004, 181 (01) :36-39
[10]  
*NAT PAT SAF AG, 2005, BUILD MEM PREV HARM