Professional differences in interprofessional working

被引:98
作者
Baxter, Susan K. [1 ]
Brumfitt, Shelagh M.
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Acad Unit Child Hlth, PGME Stephenson Unit, Western Bank, Sheffield S10 2TH, S Yorkshire, England
关键词
Interprofessional working; professional; case study; stroke;
D O I
10.1080/13561820802054655
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
UK government policy is encouraging healthcare staff to blur traditional roles, in the drive to increase joint working between practitioners. However, there is currently a lack of clarity regarding the impact that changes to traditional working practice might have on staff delivering the services, or on patient care. In this article, we report findings from three qualitative case studies examining interprofessional practice in stroke care, in which the influence of professional differences emerged as a significant theme. We draw on findings from individual semi-structured interviews, as well as fieldwork observations, to describe the influence of professional knowledge and skills, role and identity, and power and status considerations in interprofessional working. The insights that were gained contribute to the understanding of how professional differences impact on healthcare staff joint working, and suggest that the elements identified need to be fully considered in drives towards changed working practice.
引用
收藏
页码:239 / 251
页数:13
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], LEARNING BRISTOL ARE
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, CLIN REASONING HLTH
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Collaborative Care Interprofessional, interagency and Interpersonal
[4]  
[Anonymous], INTERPROFESSIONAL RE
[5]  
[Anonymous], CHANGING PRACTICE HL
[6]  
[Anonymous], CHANGING PRACTICE HL
[7]  
[Anonymous], CLIN REASONING HLTH
[8]  
BECHOFER F, 2000, PRINCIPLES RES DESIG
[9]  
Berg B.L., 2009, Qualitative research methods for the social sciences, V7th
[10]  
Bromme R., 1995, Learning and Instruction, V5, P261, DOI DOI 10.1016/0959-4752(95)00018-6