Comparison of mortality rates in acute myocardial infarction treated by percutaneous coronary intervention versus fibrinolysis

被引：65

作者：

Betriu, A ^{[1
]}

Masotti, M ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Barcelona, Hosp Clin, Cardiovasc Inst, E-08036 Barcelona, Spain

来源：

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY | 2005年 / 95卷 / 01期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.08.069

中图分类号：

R5 [内科学];

学科分类号：

1002 ; 100201 ;

摘要：

We studied the relation between angioplasty-related time delay and the effectiveness of the intervention in decreasing death compared with fibrinolysis in patients who had acute myocardial infarction. The absolute survival benefit of angioplasty compared with fibrinolysis decreased by 0.24% for every additional 10-minute delay. Regression analysis showed that percutaneous coronary intervention remained superior to fibrinolysis when a time delay related to percutaneous coronary intervention extended to 110 minutes. (C)2005 by Excerpta Medica Inc.

引用

页码：100 / 101

页数：2

共 9 条

[1] A comparison of coronary angioplasty with fibrinolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction
Andersen, HR
Nielsen, TT
Rasmussen, K
Thuesen, L
Kelbaek, H
Thayssen, P
Abildgaard, U
Pedersen, F
Madsen, JK
Grande, P
Villadsen, AB
Krusell, LR
Haghfelt, T
Lomholt, P
Husted, SE
Vigholt, E
Kjaergard, HK
Mortensen, LS
[J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2003, 349 (08) : 733 - 742
[2] A Randomized trial of transfer for primary angioplasty versus on-site thrombolysis in patients with high-risk myocardial infarction - The Air Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction study
Grines, CL
Westerhausen, DR
Grines, LL
Hanlon, JT
Logemann, TL
Niemela, M
Weaver, WD
Graham, M
Boura, J
O'Neill, WW
Balestrini, C
[J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2002, 39 (11) : 1713 - 1719
[3] HOCHMAN JS, 1999, NEW ENGL J MED, V26, P341
[4] Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials
Keeley, EC
Boura, JA
Grines, CL
[J]. LANCET, 2003, 361 (9351) : 13 - 20
[5] Kent D M, 2001, Eff Clin Pract, V4, P214
[6] Percutaneous coronary intervention versus fibrinolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction: Is timing (almost) everything?
Nallamothu, BK
Bates, ER
[J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 92 (07) : 824 - 826
[7] Prospective randomised comparison between thrombolysis, rescue PTCA, and primary PTCA in patients with extensive myocardial infarction admitted to a hospital without PTCA facilities:: a safety and feasibility study
Vermeer, F
Ophuis, AJMO
van der Berg, EJ
Brunninkhuis, LG
Werter, CJ
Boehmer, AG
Lousberg, AH
Dassen, WR
Bär, FW
[J]. HEART, 1999, 82 (04) : 426 - 431
[8] Multicentre randomized trial comparing transport to primary angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis vs combined strategy for patients with acute myocardial infarction presenting to a community hospital without a catheterization laboratory -: The PRAGUE study
Widimsky, P
Groch, L
Zelízko, M
Aschermann, M
Bednár, F
Suryapranata, H
[J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2000, 21 (10) : 823 - 831
[9] Determination of the conformation and stability of simple homopolypeptides using solid-state NMR
Wildman, KAH
Wilson, EE
Lee, DK
Ramamoorthy, A
[J]. SOLID STATE NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 2003, 24 (2-3) : 94 - 109

← 1 →