Qualitative research-enhanced understanding of patients' beliefs: Results of focus groups with low-income, urban, African American adults with asthma

被引:93
作者
George, M
Freedman, TG
Norfleet, AL
Feldman, HI
Apter, AJ
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Med, Div Pulm Allergy & Crit Care Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Ctr Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Univ Penn, Sch Nursing, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[4] Univ Penn, Gen Clin Res Ctr, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1067/mai.2003.1459
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: Qualitative research is an important research methodology for understanding the health beliefs and attitudes of patients. These beliefs and attitudes have been proposed as partial explanations for low adherence to medical therapy and the consequent high burden of morbidity from asthma among low-income urban minorities. Objective: The purpose of this study was to explore barriers to adherence to inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs), health beliefs regarding asthma and its treatment, and opinions about providers and clinical research among low-income groups. Methods: Three focus groups were conducted with 15 low-income, urban, African American adults with persistent asthma. These focus group sessions were audiotaped, transcribed verbatim, and coded by using qualitative analytic techniques. Results: Health beliefs that influenced adherence included patients' reliance on their assessment of asthma control over that of the health provider and concern over the adverse effects of ICS therapy. Adherence was also adversely affected by social obligations and insurers' approval policies and restricted formularies. Although mistrust of the medical establishment was evident, members generally expressed a willingness to participate in nonpharmacologic clinical research and the belief that research was beneficial. However, they had strong preferences for where the research should be conducted. Conclusions: Although barriers exist to ICS adherence in patient populations, many of these can be addressed during patient-clinician interactions. Qualitative research is an important tool for formulating hypotheses for improving ICS adherence that can then be tested in the future by using quantitative research methods.
引用
收藏
页码:967 / 973
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Medication, chronic illness and identity: The perspective of people with asthma [J].
Adams, S ;
Pill, R ;
Jones, A .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1997, 45 (02) :189-201
[2]  
[Anonymous], NY TIMES MAGAZI 1020
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, UN TREATM CONFR RAC
[4]   Adherence with twice-daily dosing of inhaled steroids - Socioeconomic and health-belief differences [J].
Apter, AJ ;
Reisine, ST ;
Affleck, G ;
Barrows, E ;
ZuWallack, RL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1998, 157 (06) :1810-1817
[5]   Survival of blacks and whites after a cancer diagnosis [J].
Bach, PB ;
Schrag, D ;
Brawley, OW ;
Galaznik, A ;
Yakren, S ;
Begg, CB .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 287 (16) :2106-2113
[6]   Perception of the role and potential side effects of inhaled corticosteroids among asthmatic patients [J].
Boulet, LP .
CHEST, 1998, 113 (03) :587-592
[7]   Qualitative studies on the patient's experience of weaning from mechanical ventilation [J].
Cook, DJ ;
Meade, MO ;
Perry, AG .
CHEST, 2001, 120 (06) :469S-473S
[8]   Treatment patterns among adult patients with asthma -: Factors associated with overuse of inhaled β-agonists and underuse of inhaled corticosteroids [J].
Diette, GB ;
Wu, AW ;
Skinner, EA ;
Markson, L ;
Clark, RD ;
McDonald, RC ;
Healy, JP ;
Huber, M ;
Steinwachs, DM .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1999, 159 (22) :2697-2704
[9]   Why don't they come to Pike street and ask us?: Black American women's health concerns [J].
Freedman, TG .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1998, 47 (07) :941-947
[10]   Users' guides to the medical literature - XXIII. Qualitative research in health care B. What are the results and how do they help me care for my patients? [J].
Giacomini, MK ;
Cook, DJ .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 284 (04) :478-482