The Janus Face of the Liberal International Information Order: When Global Institutions Are Self-Undermining

被引:29
作者
Farrell, Henry [1 ]
Newman, Abraham L. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Sch Adv Int Studies, Washington, DC 20036 USA
[2] Georgetown Univ, Edmund A Walsh Sch Foreign Serv, Washington, DC 20057 USA
[3] Georgetown Univ, Govt Dept, Washington, DC 20057 USA
关键词
Internet; disinformation; information technology; globalization; international liberal order; democracy; SOCIAL MEDIA; HISTORICAL INSTITUTIONALISM; INTERNET GOVERNANCE; POWER; CHINA; STATE; INTERDEPENDENCE; CENSORSHIP; WARFARE; POLICY;
D O I
10.1017/S0020818320000302
中图分类号
D81 [国际关系];
学科分类号
030207 [国际关系];
摘要
Scholars and policymakers long believed that norms of global information openness and private-sector governance helped to sustain and promote liberalism. These norms are being increasingly contested within liberal democracies. In this article, we argue that a key source of debate over the Liberal International Information Order (LIIO), a sub-order of the Liberal International Order (LIO), is generated internally by "self-undermining feedback effects," that is, mechanisms through which institutional arrangements undermine their own political conditions of survival over time. Empirically, we demonstrate how global governance of the Internet, transnational disinformation campaigns, and domestic information governance interact to sow the seeds of this contention. In particular, illiberal states converted norms of openness into a vector of attack, unsettling political bargains in liberal states concerning the LIIO. More generally, we set out a broader research agenda to show how the international relations discipline might better understand institutional change as well as the informational aspects of the current crisis in the LIO.
引用
收藏
页码:333 / 358
页数:26
相关论文
共 101 条
[1]
The Epistemological Challenge of Truth Subversion to the Liberal International Order [J].
Adler, Emanuel ;
Drieschova, Alena .
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION, 2021, 75 (02) :359-386
[2]
Struggles for Recognition: The Liberal International Order and the Merger of Its Discontents [J].
Adler-Nissen, Rebecca ;
Zarakol, Ayse .
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION, 2021, 75 (02) :611-634
[3]
[Anonymous], 2009, Explaining institutional change: ambiguity, agency, and power
[4]
Acting the part: Examining information operations within #BlackLivesMatter discourse [J].
Arif A. ;
Stewart L.G. ;
Starbird K. .
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2018, 2 (CSCW)
[5]
Varieties of cooperation: the domestic institutional roots of global governance [J].
Bach, David .
REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES, 2010, 36 (03) :561-589
[6]
Assessing the Russian Internet Research Agency's impact on the political attitudes and behaviors of American Twitter users in late 2017 [J].
Bail, Christopher A. ;
Guay, Brian ;
Maloney, Emily ;
Combs, Aidan ;
Hillygus, D. Sunshine ;
Merhout, Friedolin ;
Freelon, Deen ;
Volfovsky, Alexander .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2020, 117 (01) :243-250
[7]
Benkler Y., 2018, NETWORK PROPAGANDA, DOI DOI 10.1093/OSO/9780190923624.001.0001
[8]
Russian Information Warfare as Domestic Counterinsurgency [J].
Blank, Stephen .
AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY INTERESTS, 2013, 35 (01) :31-44
[9]
Boas TC, 2006, HOW REVOLUTIONARY WAS THE DIGITAL REVOLUTION?, P361
[10]
Contestations of the Liberal International Order: From Liberal Multilateralism to Postnational Liberalism [J].
Boerzel, Tanja A. ;
Zuern, Michael .
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION, 2021, 75 (02) :282-305