Mutation and the evolution of recombination

被引:53
作者
Barton, N. H. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] IST Austria, A-3400 Klosterneuburg, Austria
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Inst Evolutionary Biol, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
modifier; mutation load; evolution of recombination; Hill-Robertson effect; SLIGHTLY DELETERIOUS MUTATIONS; BACKGROUND SELECTION; NATURAL-SELECTION; NEUTRAL POLYMORPHISM; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; COALESCENT PROCESS; MULLERS RATCHET; POPULATION-SIZE; SEX; ADAPTATION;
D O I
10.1098/rstb.2009.0320
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Under the classical view, selection depends more or less directly on mutation: standing genetic variance is maintained by a balance between selection and mutation, and adaptation is fuelled by new favourable mutations. Recombination is favoured if it breaks negative associations among selected alleles, which interfere with adaptation. Such associations may be generated by negative epistasis, or by random drift (leading to the Hill-Robertson effect). Both deterministic and stochastic explanations depend primarily on the genomic mutation rate, U. This may be large enough to explain high recombination rates in some organisms, but seems unlikely to be so in general. Random drift is a more general source of negative linkage disequilibria, and can cause selection for recombination even in large populations, through the chance loss of new favourable mutations. The rate of species-wide substitutions is much too low to drive this mechanism, but local fluctuations in selection, combined with gene flow, may suffice. These arguments are illustrated by comparing the interaction between good and bad mutations at unlinked loci under the infinitesimal model.
引用
收藏
页码:1281 / 1294
页数:14
相关论文
共 100 条
[1]   Sexual selection and the maintenance of sexual reproduction [J].
Agrawal, AF .
NATURE, 2001, 411 (6838) :692-695
[2]   Evolution of sex: Why do organisms shuffle their genotypes? [J].
Agrawal, Aneil F. .
CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2006, 16 (17) :R696-R704
[3]  
AGUADE M, 1989, GENETICS, V122, P607
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1999, The genetical theory of natural selection: a complete variorum edition
[5]   Reduced adaptation of a non-recombining neo-Y chromosome [J].
Bachtrog, D ;
Charlesworth, B .
NATURE, 2002, 416 (6878) :323-326
[6]   Why Sex and Recombination? [J].
Barton, N. H. .
EVOLUTION: THE MOLECULAR LANDSCAPE, 2009, 74 :187-195
[7]   A GENERAL-MODEL FOR THE EVOLUTION OF RECOMBINATION [J].
BARTON, NH .
GENETICAL RESEARCH, 1995, 65 (02) :123-144
[8]   Evolution of recombination due to random dirift [J].
Barton, NH ;
Otto, SP .
GENETICS, 2005, 169 (04) :2353-2370
[9]   The effect of selection on genealogies [J].
Barton, NH ;
Etheridge, AM .
GENETICS, 2004, 166 (02) :1115-1131
[10]   Why sex and recombination? [J].
Barton, NH ;
Charlesworth, B .
SCIENCE, 1998, 281 (5385) :1986-1990