How Are Moral Foundations Associated with Climate-Friendly Consumption?

被引:40
作者
Vainio, Annukka [1 ]
Makiniemi, Jaana-Piia [2 ]
机构
[1] Nat Resources Inst Finland Luke, Latokartanonkaari 9, Helsinki 00790, Finland
[2] Univ Tampere, Sch Management, Kanslerinrinne 1, Tampere 33100, Finland
关键词
Climate change; Moral foundations; Moral relevance; Political orientation; Consumption; Finland; YOUNG-ADULTS; ENVIRONMENTAL BEHAVIOR; PLANNED BEHAVIOR; VALIDITY; VALUES; LIBERALS; CONSERVATIVES; DETERMINANTS; CONFIDENCE; INTUITIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s10806-016-9601-3
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
We examined whether differences in climate-friendly choices between the supporters of left-wing and right-wing ideologies are based on different moral foundations. Moreover, we compared general and issue-specific endorsement of moral foundations applied to climate change. Study 1 examined the endorsement of general moral foundations of university students living in Finland (N = 272). Individualizing foundations were associated with increased climate-friendly choices and binding foundations were associated with decreased climate-friendly choices; the endorsement of moral foundations made the effect of political orientation disappear. In Study 2 we developed and tested an issue-specific measure of moral foundations (N = 350). The issue-specific endorsement of both types of foundations was directly associated with increased climate-friendly consumption. Binding foundations were associated with the avoidance of climate-friendly choices through right-wing orientation. These findings increase our understanding of differences between general and issue-specific moral concerns and their association to political orientation and pro-environmental behavior.
引用
收藏
页码:265 / 283
页数:19
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change? [J].
Adger, W. Neil ;
Dessai, Suraje ;
Goulden, Marisa ;
Hulme, Mike ;
Lorenzoni, Irene ;
Nelson, Donald R. ;
Naess, Lars Otto ;
Wolf, Johanna ;
Wreford, Anita .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2009, 93 (3-4) :335-354
[2]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1981, Social Measurement: Current Issues
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2011, SPECIAL EUROBAROMETE
[5]  
Arbuckle J. L., 2011, IBM SPSS AMOS 21 USE
[6]   Ideological views in emerging adulthood: Balancing autonomy and community [J].
Arnett, JJ ;
Ramos, KD ;
Jensen, LA .
JOURNAL OF ADULT DEVELOPMENT, 2001, 8 (02) :69-79
[7]   How does environmental concern influence specific environmentally related behaviors? A new answer to an old question [J].
Bamberg, S .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 23 (01) :21-32
[8]   Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera:: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour [J].
Bamberg, Sebastian ;
Moeser, Guido .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 27 (01) :14-25
[9]  
BENTLER PM, 1990, PSYCHOL BULL, V107, P238, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
[10]   Encouraging sustainability in the workplace: a survey on the pro-environmental behaviour of university employees [J].
Blok, Vincent ;
Wesselink, Renate ;
Studynka, Oldrich ;
Kemp, Ron .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2015, 106 :55-67