The map equation

被引:554
作者
Rosvall, M. [1 ]
Axelsson, D. [1 ]
Bergstrom, C. T. [2 ]
机构
[1] Umea Univ, Dept Phys, S-90187 Umea, Sweden
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Biol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; COMPLEX NETWORKS; MODULARITY;
D O I
10.1140/epjst/e2010-01179-1
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
Many real-world networks are so large that we must simplify their structure before we can extract useful information about the systems they represent. As the tools for doing these simplifications proliferate within the network literature, researchers would benefit from some guidelines about which of the so-called community detection algorithms are most appropriate for the structures they are studying and the questions they are asking. Here we show that different methods highlight different aspects of a network's structure and that the the sort of information that we seek to extract about the system must guide us in our decision. For example, many community detection algorithms, including the popular modularity maximization approach, infer module assignments from an underlying model of the network formation process. However, we are not always as interested in how a system's network structure was formed, as we are in how a network's extant structure influences the system's behavior. To see how structure influences current behavior, we will recognize that links in a network induce movement across the network and result in system-wide interdependence. In doing so, we explicitly acknowledge that most networks carry flow. To highlight and simplify the network structure with respect to this flow, we use the map equation. We present an intuitive derivation of this flow-based and information-theoretic method and provide an interactive on-line application that anyone can use to explore the mechanics of the map equation. The differences between the map equation and the modularity maximization approach are not merely conceptual. Because the map equation attends to patterns of flow on the network and the modularity maximization approach does not, the two methods can yield dramatically different results for some network structures. To illustrate this and build our understanding of each method, we partition several sample networks. We also describe an algorithm and provide source code to efficiently decompose large weighted and directed networks based on the map equation.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 23
页数:11
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Advances in Minimum Description Length: Theory and Applications
[2]   Size reduction of complex networks preserving modularity [J].
Arenas, A. ;
Duch, J. ;
Fernandez, A. ;
Gomez, S. .
NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2007, 9
[3]   Fast unfolding of communities in large networks [J].
Blondel, Vincent D. ;
Guillaume, Jean-Loup ;
Lambiotte, Renaud ;
Lefebvre, Etienne .
JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL MECHANICS-THEORY AND EXPERIMENT, 2008,
[4]  
BOLDI P, 2009, ACM T INF S IN PRESS
[5]   The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine [J].
Brin, S ;
Page, L .
COMPUTER NETWORKS AND ISDN SYSTEMS, 1998, 30 (1-7) :107-117
[6]  
Clauset A, 2004, PHYS REV E, V70, DOI 10.1103/PhysRevE.70.066111
[7]   Hierarchical structure and the prediction of missing links in networks [J].
Clauset, Aaron ;
Moore, Cristopher ;
Newman, M. E. J. .
NATURE, 2008, 453 (7191) :98-101
[8]   Stability of graph communities across time scales [J].
Delvenne, J. -C. ;
Yaliraki, S. N. ;
Barahona, M. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2010, 107 (29) :12755-12760
[9]  
Donath W. E., 1972, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, V15, P938
[10]   Modularity and extreme edges of the Internet [J].
Eriksen, KA ;
Simonsen, I ;
Maslov, S ;
Sneppen, K .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2003, 90 (14) :4