Social and familial context of prenatal genetic testing decisions: Are there racial/ethnic differences?

被引:53
作者
Learman, LA
Kuppermann, M
Gates, E
Nease, RF
Gildengorin, V
Washington, AE
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, Div Gen Gynecol, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Express Scripts Inc, Appl Decis Anal, St Louis, MO USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Gen Internal Med, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART C-SEMINARS IN MEDICAL GENETICS | 2003年 / 119C卷 / 01期
关键词
prenatal genetic testing; Down syndrome; racial/ethnic differences; individual differences; attitudes; health beliefs; interpersonal influence; social influence; family influence; faith/religion;
D O I
10.1002/ajmg.c.10004
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
The purpose of this cross-sectional study of 999 socioeconomically and racially/ethnically diverse pregnant women was to explore prenatal genetic testing attitudes and beliefs and the role of external influences. Surveys in English, Spanish, and Chinese included questions regarding the value of testing, pregnancy, and motherhood; the acceptability of Down syndrome in the subject's community; and the role of social and cultural influences in prenatal testing decisions. We analyzed racial/ethnic differences in all attitudinal and external influence variables, controlling for age, relationship status, and socioeconomic status. We found statistically significant racial/ethnic group differences in familiarity with an individual with Down syndrome and in 10 of 12 attitude, belief, and external influence variables, even after controlling for other sociodemographic characteristics. We also observed substantial variation within racial/ethnic groups for each of these measures. Despite the statistically significant group differences observed, R-2 values for all multivariate models were modest and response distributions overlapped substantially. Social and familial contexts for prenatal testing decisions differ among racial/ethnic groups even after accounting for age, marital status, and other socioeconomic factors. However, substantial variation within groups and overlap between groups suggest that racial/ethnic differences play a small role in the social and familial context of prenatal genetic testing decisions. (C) 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 26
页数:8
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
*CDCP, 2001, MMWR-MORBID MORTAL W, V50, P263
[2]  
Forrester MB, 1999, PRENATAL DIAG, V19, P136, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0223(199902)19:2<136::AID-PD479>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-Z
[4]   COMPARISON OF WOMEN WHO DO AND DO NOT HAVE AMNIOCENTESIS OR CHORIONIC VILLUS SAMPLING [J].
HALLIDAY, J ;
LUMLEY, J ;
WATSON, L .
LANCET, 1995, 345 (8951) :704-709
[5]  
Hook EB, 1999, PRENATAL DIAG, V19, P245, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0223(199903)19:3<245::AID-PD523>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-B
[7]   PRENATAL SCREENING AND ITS IMPACT ON PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES [J].
KAPLAN, D .
FETAL DIAGNOSIS AND THERAPY, 1993, 8 :64-69
[8]   Procedure-related miscarriages and Down syndrome-affected births: Implications for prenatal testing based on women's preferences [J].
Kuppermann, M ;
Nease, RF ;
Learman, LA ;
Gates, E ;
Blumberg, B ;
Washington, AE .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 96 (04) :511-516
[9]   Racial-ethnic differences in prenatal diagnostic test use and outcomes: Preferences, socioeconomics, or patient knowledge? [J].
Kuppermann, M ;
Gates, E ;
Washington, E .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 87 (05) :675-682
[10]  
Kuppermann M, 1999, PRENATAL DIAG, V19, P711, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0223(199908)19:8<711::AID-PD614>3.0.CO