Evaluation of packed red blood cell transfusion practice in anaesthesia and intensive care

被引:5
作者
Quaranta, JF
Raucoules, M
Jambou, P
Grimaud, D
机构
[1] Cellule d'Hémovigilance, Hôpital Pasteur, CHU de Nice, 06002 Nice Cedex 01, 30, avenue de la Voie-Romaine
[2] Dept. d'Anesthesie-Reanimation, Hôpital Pasteur, CHU de Nice, 06002 Nice Cedex 01, 30, avenue de la Voie-Romaine
来源
ANNALES FRANCAISES D ANESTHESIE ET DE REANIMATION | 1996年 / 15卷 / 01期
关键词
packed red blood cells; transfusion practice; consensus conference; evaluation;
D O I
10.1016/0750-7658(96)89398-1
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess the relevance of perioperative packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion practice at the University Hospital of Nice, compared with information from the consensus conference on red blood cell transfusion, held by the French Society of Anaesthesia and intensive Care (SFAR) and the National Agency for the Development of Medical Evaluation (ANDEM) in December 1993. Study design: Retrospective case series analysis. Patients: The study included 240 medical files of surgical patients, transfused in 1994 with PRBC, obtained by drawing of lots following a methodology recommended by ANDEM. Method: A reference list according to the statement of the consensus conference was designed for the various surgical specialities and the ICU in which PRBC had been transfused. It included the clinical and laboratory criteria which justified the transfusion, as well as the various categories of PRBC (phenotyped, cytomegalovirus negative, leukocyte-depleted, etc). Autotransfused PRBC were also considered. The data collected from the medical files of the 240 patients were compared with the reference list. Results: In 84,6% of patients (203/240), the PRBC transfusion had been decided with reference either only to a haematocrit level below 0.27 or a level between 0.27 and 0.30 associated with clinical evidence of bad tolerance of blood loss, according to the reference list. A lack of compliance with the reference list occurred in 15.4% of patients (37/240), who had been transfused without any reference to a biological criterion. Another non compliance existed in 50% of patients (12/24) transfused with phenotyped PRBC and in 35.3% (6/17) of those transfused with leucocyte-depleted PRBC. An autotransfusion with PRBC had been carried out in 30.4% of patients (75/240). Discussion: These deviations of transfusion practice from the consensus conference statement, which were more pronounced with phenotyped and leucocyte-depleted PRCB than conventional PRBC, resulted in the edition of a report, with an analysis of the causes of deviations and recommendations for all doctors of our institution prescribing blood transfusions. Another evaluation, extended also to the medical specialities of our hospital and including all blood derivates is planned for 1996.
引用
收藏
页码:20 / 26
页数:7
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]  
ANDREU G, 1993, NOUV REV FR HEMATOL, V35, P517
[2]  
GOFFIN C, 1989, TRANSFUSION, V29, P298
[3]  
GUELDRY C, 1994, EVALUATION MED CONCE, P104
[4]   CONSUMPTION OF HOMOLOGOUS PACKED RED-CELLS - ANALYSIS OF THE FACTORS INVOLVED IN ITS REDUCTION [J].
JANVIER, G ;
DUGRAIS, G ;
WINNOCK, S ;
VALLET, A ;
DARDEL, E ;
MARY, F ;
ERNY, P ;
VEZON, G .
ANNALES FRANCAISES D ANESTHESIE ET DE REANIMATION, 1991, 10 (04) :333-336
[5]   EVALUATION OF THE APPROPRIATENESS OF BLOOD AND BLOOD PRODUCT TRANSFUSION USING PRESET CRITERIA [J].
MOZES, B ;
EPSTEIN, M ;
BENBASSAT, I ;
MODAN, B ;
HALKIN, H .
TRANSFUSION, 1989, 29 (06) :473-476
[6]  
1993, C CONSENSUS APPORTS
[7]  
1985, DGS3B552 MIN AFF SOC
[8]  
1992, AUDIT MED METHODE EV, P52