Randomized comparison of cisplatin and etoposide and either bleomycin or ifosfamide in treatment of advanced-disseminated germ cell tumors: An eastern cooperative oncology group, southwest oncology group, and cancer and leukemia group B study

被引:218
作者
Nichols, CR
Catalano, PJ
Crawford, ED
Vogelzang, NJ
Einhorn, LH
Loehrer, PJ
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Sch Med, Div Hematol Oncol, Med Ctr, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[2] Indianapolis Vet Adm Hosp, Indianapolis, IN USA
[3] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Univ Colorado, Denver, CO 80202 USA
[5] Univ Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.1998.16.4.1287
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To compare standard therapy with bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP) to experimental therapy with etoposide, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (VIP) as primary treatment of men with advanced, disseminated germ cell tumors, Patients and Methods: A total of 304 men with advanced disseminated germ cell rumors were randomly allocated to receive four courses of BEP or VIP, Two hundred ninety-nine patients were assessable for toxicity and 286 were assessable for response, Complete response rates, favorable response (complete remission, surgical free of disease, continuous partial remission for 2+ years), time to treatment failure, and overall survival were assessed, Results: Overall complete remission rate (VIP, 37%; BEP, 31%), favorable response rate (VIP, 63%; BEP, 60%), failure-free at 2 years (VIP, 64%; BEP, 60%), and 2-year overall survival (VIP, 74%; BEP, 71%) were not significantly different between the two treatments, Grade 3 or worse toxicity, particularly hematologic and genitourinary toxicity, was significantly more common in patients who received VIP, Conclusion: BEP and VIP produce comparable favorable response rare and survival in patients with poor-risk germ cell tumors, The substitution of ifosfamide for bleomycin, however, was associated with significantly greater toxicity, Four courses of BEP remain the standard treatment for advanced disseminated germ cell tumors. (C) 1998 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
引用
收藏
页码:1287 / 1293
页数:7
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF ETOPOSIDE AND CISPLATIN VERSUS ETOPOSIDE AND CARBOPLATIN IN PATIENTS WITH GOOD-RISK GERM-CELL TUMORS - A MULTIINSTITUTIONAL STUDY
    BAJORIN, DF
    SAROSDY, MF
    PFISTER, DG
    MAZUMDAR, M
    MOTZER, RJ
    SCHER, HI
    GELLER, NL
    FAIR, WR
    HERR, H
    SOGANI, P
    SHEINFELD, J
    RUSSO, P
    VLAMIS, V
    CAREY, R
    VOGELZANG, NJ
    CRAWFORD, ED
    BOSL, GJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1993, 11 (04) : 598 - 606
  • [2] PROGNOSTIC FACTORS FOR FAVORABLE OUTCOME IN DISSEMINATED GERM-CELL TUMORS
    BIRCH, R
    WILLIAMS, S
    CONE, A
    EINHORN, L
    ROARK, P
    TURNER, S
    GRECO, FA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1986, 4 (03) : 400 - 407
  • [3] CHEVREAU C, 1993, EUR UROL, V23, P213
  • [4] DROZ JP, 1988, CANCER, V62, P564, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19880801)62:3<564::AID-CNCR2820620321>3.0.CO
  • [5] 2-A
  • [6] Einhorn L.H., 1992, P AN M AM SOC CLIN, V11, P196
  • [7] TREATMENT OF TESTICULAR CANCER - A NEW AND IMPROVED MODEL
    EINHORN, LH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1990, 8 (11) : 1777 - 1781
  • [8] EVALUATION OF OPTIMAL DURATION OF CHEMOTHERAPY IN FAVORABLE-PROGNOSIS DISSEMINATED GERM-CELL TUMORS - A SOUTHEASTERN-CANCER-STUDY-GROUP PROTOCOL
    EINHORN, LH
    WILLIAMS, SD
    LOEHRER, PJ
    BIRCH, R
    DRASGA, R
    OMURA, G
    GRECO, FA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1989, 7 (03) : 387 - 391
  • [9] Kaye SB, 1995, P AN M AM SOC CLIN, V14, P246
  • [10] Mead GM, 1997, J CLIN ONCOL, V15, P594