Epidemiology and chemical control of take-all on seminal and adventitious roots of wheat

被引:22
作者
Bailey, DJ
Paveley, N
Pillinger, C
Foulkes, J
Spink, J
Gilligan, CA
机构
[1] Agr Dev & Advisory Serv, Malton YO17 8BP, N Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Nottingham, Div Agr & Environm Sci, Sutton, Surrey, England
[3] ADAS Rosemaund, Hereford HR1 3PG, England
[4] Univ Cambridge, Dept Plant Sci, Cambridge CB2 3EA, England
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
disease dynamics; disease progress; root growth;
D O I
10.1094/PHYTO-95-0062
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Epidemiological modeling is used to examine the effect of silthiofam seed treatment on field epidemics of take-all in winter wheat. A simple compartmental model, including terms for primary infection, secondary infection, root production, and decay of inoculum, was fitted to data describing change in the number of diseased and susceptible roots per plant over thermal time obtained from replicated field trials. This produced a composite curve describing change in the proportion of diseased roots over time that increased monotonically to an initial plateau and then increased exponentially thereafter. The shape of this curve was consistent with consecutive phases of primary and secondary infection. The seed treatment reduced the proportion of diseased roots throughout both phases of the epidemic. However, analysis with the model detected a significant reduction in the rate of primary, but not secondary, infection. The potential for silthiofam to affect secondary infection from diseased seminal or adventitious roots was examined in further detail by extending the compartmental model and fitting to change in the number of diseased and susceptible seminal or adventitious roots. Rates of secondary infection from either source of infected roots were not affected. Seed treatment controlled primary infection of seminal roots from particulate inoculum but not secondary infection from either seminal or adventitious roots. The reduction in disease for silthiofam-treated plants observed following the secondary infection phase of the epidemic was not due to long-term activity of the chemical but to the manifestation of disease control early in the epidemic.
引用
收藏
页码:62 / 68
页数:7
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Dynamics of primary and secondary infection in take-all epidemics [J].
Bailey, DJ ;
Gilligan, CA .
PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1999, 89 (01) :84-91
[2]   Epidemiological dynamics and the efficiency of biological control of soil-borne disease during consecutive epidemics in a controlled environment [J].
Bailey, DJ ;
Kleczkowski, A ;
Gilligan, CA .
NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2004, 161 (02) :569-575
[3]  
BEALE RE, 1998, P 1998 BRIGHT C PEST, V2, P343
[4]   Influence of crop management on take-all development and disease cycles on winter wheat [J].
Colbach, N ;
Lucas, P ;
Meynard, JM .
PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 1997, 87 (01) :26-32
[5]   The ability of wheat cultivars to withstand drought in UK conditions: resource capture [J].
Foulkes, MJ ;
Scott, RK ;
Sylvester-Bradley, R .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, 2001, 137 :1-16
[6]   An epidemiological framework for disease management [J].
Gilligan, CA .
ADVANCES IN BOTANICAL RESEARCH, VOL 38, 2002, 38 :1-64
[7]   COMPARISON OF DISEASE PROGRESS CURVES [J].
GILLIGAN, CA .
NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 1990, 115 (02) :223-242
[8]   Biological control in a disturbed environment [J].
Gubbins, S ;
Gilligan, CA .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1997, 352 (1364) :1935-1949
[9]  
Hornby D., 1981, Biology and control of take-all., P271
[10]  
HORNBY D, 1998, TAKE ALL DIS CEREALS, P58