Plasmapheresis in severe sepsis and septic shock: a prospective, randomised, controlled trial

被引:212
作者
Busund, R [1 ]
Koukline, V
Utrobin, U
Nedashkovsky, E
机构
[1] Univ Tromso Hosp, Dept Cardiothorac & Vasc Surg, N-9038 Tromso, Norway
[2] City Emergency Hosp 1, Dept Extracorporal Methods, Archangels, Russia
[3] City Emergency Hosp 1, Dept Anaesthesiol & Intens Care, Archangels, Russia
关键词
acute physiology and chronic health evaluation; randomised controlled trial; plasmapheresis; sepsis; septic shock; outcome;
D O I
10.1007/s00134-002-1410-7
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine the therapeutic efficacy and safety of plasmapheresis in the treatment of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. Design: Prospective, randomised, clinical trial with a planned, midstudy, interim analysis. Setting: Intensive care unit in a university hospital in Archangels, Russia. Patients: Consecutive patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. Interventions: One hundred and six patients were randomised to receive either standard therapy or an add-on treatment with plasmapheresis. Measurements and results: The primary endpoint was 28-day survival. Septic shock was diagnosed in 57% of the plasmapheresis-treated patients and 54% of the control patients. Mean APACHE III score at entry was 56.4 in the plasmapheresis group and 53.5 in the control group. The 28-day, all-cause mortality rate was 33.3% (18/54) in the plasmapheresis group and 53.8% (28/52) in the control group. This represents a relative risk for fatal outcome in the plasmapheresis group of 0.61, an absolute risk reduction of 20.5% and a number of patients needed to treat of 4.9. Apart from six transient episodes of hypotension and one allergic reaction to fresh frozen plasma, no adverse reactions were attributable to the plasmapheresis treatment in this study. Conclusions: Plasmapheresis may be an important adjuvant to conventional treatment to reduce mortality in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock. Plasmapheresis is a safe procedure in the treatment of septic patients. A prospective randomised multicentre trial is warranted to confirm our results and to determine which subgroups of septic patients will benefit most from this treatment modality.
引用
收藏
页码:1434 / 1439
页数:6
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Septic shock
    Astiz, ME
    Rackow, EC
    [J]. LANCET, 1998, 351 (9114) : 1501 - 1505
  • [2] BARIE PS, 1995, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V130, P77
  • [3] MENINGOCOCCAL SEPTICEMIA TREATED WITH COMBINED PLASMAPHERESIS AND LEUKAPHERESIS OR WITH BLOOD-EXCHANGE
    BJORVATN, B
    BJERTNAES, L
    FADNES, HO
    FLAEGSTAD, T
    GUTTEBERG, TJ
    KRISTIANSEN, BE
    PAPE, J
    REKVIG, OP
    OSTERUD, B
    AANDERUD, L
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1984, 288 (6415): : 439 - 441
  • [4] DEFINITIONS FOR SEPSIS AND ORGAN FAILURE AND GUIDELINES FOR THE USE OF INNOVATIVE THERAPIES IN SEPSIS
    BONE, RC
    BALK, RA
    CERRA, FB
    DELLINGER, RP
    FEIN, AM
    KNAUS, WA
    SCHEIN, RMH
    SIBBALD, WJ
    [J]. CHEST, 1992, 101 (06) : 1644 - 1655
  • [5] Brandtzaeg P, 1985, Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl, V178, P53
  • [6] BUSUND R, 1991, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V126, P591
  • [7] BUSUND R, 1993, CIRC SHOCK, V40, P268
  • [8] *CTR DIS CONTR, 1990, MMWR-MORBID MORTAL W, V39, P31
  • [9] PLASMAPHERESIS FOR FULMINANT MENINGOCOCCEMIA
    DRAPKIN, MS
    WISCH, JS
    GELFAND, JA
    CANNON, JG
    DINARELLO, CA
    [J]. PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASE JOURNAL, 1989, 8 (06) : 399 - 400
  • [10] Effectiveness of therapeutic plasma exchange in the 1996 Lanarkshire Escherichia coli O157:H7 outbreak
    Dundas, S
    Murphy, J
    Soutar, RL
    Jones, GA
    Hutchinson, SJ
    Todd, WTA
    [J]. LANCET, 1999, 354 (9187) : 1327 - 1330