NIR and DRIFT-MIR spectrometry of soils for predicting soil and crop parameters in a flooded field

被引:90
作者
van Groenigen, JW
Mutters, CS
Horwath, WR
van Kessel, C
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Agron & Range Sci, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] Univ Calif Cooperat Extens, Oroville, CA 95965 USA
[3] Dept Land Air & Water Resources, Davis, CA 95616 USA
关键词
crops; diffuse reflectance; mid infrared; near infrared; PLS regression; rice; soil fertility;
D O I
10.1023/A:1022893520315
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The increasing popularity of site-specific management (SSM) calls for fast, inexpensive, simultaneous analyses of large numbers of soil variables. The objective of this study was to assess the potential of near infrared (NIR) and diffuse reflectance Fourier transformed in the mid-infrared range (DRIFT-MIR) spectrometry for predicting crop and soil parameters in a flooded California rice field. Two transects of 400 m each were left unfertilized, and 100 sample locations were established. Soil samples were taken in spring, and crop and weed samples at harvest. IR spectra were linked to total soil C and N, mineralizable N, P Olsen, effective cation exchange capacity (eCEC) and exchangeable cations (Ca, Mg, Na and K), as well as yield, N uptake, biomass and weed biomass using partial least squares regression (PLSr). The PLSr models were calibrated using 50 random observations, and validated using the remaining 50 observations. For soil, predictions for eCEC, Ca and Mg were the most accurate, with r(2) values of 0.83, 0.80 and 0.90 for NIR and 0.56, 0.60 and 0.61 for DRIFT-MIR. Correlations for P Olsen were 0.71 and 0.55, and for mineralizable N 0.46 and 0.21, respectively. No significant correlations were found for total soil C or N. For crop parameters, only weed pressure (r(2) of 0.55 and 0.44) and straw biomass (0.30 and 0.34) yielded significant correlations. The correlation with weed pressure was an indirect effect due to better competition by weeds compared to rice under low soil fertility levels. For most parameters, standard errors of prediction were lower than reported in the literature. This indicates that the small range of variability within a field might be the limiting factor in predicting these parameters. It also illustrates the limited use of correlation coefficients in PLSr model validations. We concluded that NIR spectrometry shows promise for SSM, although its predictive power for parameters may vary from site to site. Moreover, predictive models remain unique for specific agroecosystems, and therefore have to be calibrated for every area. The fast and accurate predictions for Ca and Mg concentrations in the soil could be especially important in diagnosing and combating grass tetany, which strongly depends upon Ca and Mg concentrations in the soil.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 165
页数:11
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2000, MULTIVARIATE DATA AN
[2]  
Atherton BC, 1999, J SOIL WATER CONSERV, V54, P455
[3]   DIFFUSE REFLECTANCE AND TRANSMISSION FOURIER-TRANSFORM INFRARED (DRIFT) SPECTROSCOPY OF HUMIC AND FULVIC-ACIDS [J].
BAES, AU ;
BLOOM, PR .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1989, 53 (03) :695-700
[4]   NEAR-INFRARED ANALYSIS AS A RAPID METHOD TO SIMULTANEOUSLY EVALUATE SEVERAL SOIL PROPERTIES [J].
BENDOR, E ;
BANIN, A .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1995, 59 (02) :364-372
[5]   NIR spectroscopy, mineral nitrogen analysis and soil incubations for the prediction of crop uptake of nitrogen during the growing season [J].
Börjesson, T ;
Stenberg, B ;
Lindén, B ;
Jonsson, A .
PLANT AND SOIL, 1999, 214 (1-2) :75-83
[6]   Pedology, precision agriculture, and the changing paradigm of agricultural research [J].
Bouma, J ;
Stoorvogel, J ;
van Alphen, BJ ;
Booltink, HWG .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1999, 63 (06) :1763-1768
[7]  
BOWERS S. A., 1965, SOIL SCI, V100, P130, DOI 10.1097/00010694-196508000-00009
[8]  
Bundy LG, 1994, METHODS SOIL ANAL 2, V5, P951, DOI DOI 10.2136/SSSABOOKSER5.2.C41
[10]   Near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy-principal components regression analyses of soil properties [J].
Chang, CW ;
Laird, DA ;
Mausbach, MJ ;
Hurburgh, CR .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2001, 65 (02) :480-490