Radiomic and radiogenomic modeling for radiotherapy: strategies, pitfalls, and challenges

被引:15
作者
Coates, James T. T. [1 ,2 ]
Pirovano, Giacomo [3 ]
El Naqa, Issam [4 ]
机构
[1] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Ctr Canc Res, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY 10021 USA
[4] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Dept Machine Learning, Tampa, FL USA
关键词
radiogenomics; radiomics; radiotherapy; predictive modeling; outcomes; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORK; NORMAL TISSUE; DOSE-VOLUME; PROSTATE-CANCER; LATE TOXICITY; RISK-FACTORS; BIG DATA; RADIATION; PROBABILITY; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1117/1.JMI.8.3.031902
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
100231 [临床病理学]; 100902 [航空航天医学];
摘要
The power of predictive modeling for radiotherapy outcomes has historically been limited by an inability to adequately capture patient-specific variabilities; however, next-generation platforms together with imaging technologies and powerful bioinformatic tools have facilitated strategies and provided optimism. Integrating clinical, biological, imaging, and treatment-specific data for more accurate prediction of tumor control probabilities or risk of radiation-induced side effects are high-dimensional problems whose solutions could have wide-spread benefits to a diverse patient population-we discuss technical approaches toward this objective. Increasing interest in the above is specifically reflected by the emergence of two nascent fields, which are distinct but complementary: radiogenomics, which broadly seeks to integrate biological risk factors together with treatment and diagnostic information to generate individualized patient risk profiles, and radiomics, which further leverages large-scale imaging correlates and extracted features for the same purpose. We review classical analytical and data-driven approaches for outcomes prediction that serve as antecedents to both radiomic and radiogenomic strategies. Discussion then focuses on uses of conventional and deep machine learning in radiomics. We further consider promising strategies for the harmonization of high-dimensional, heterogeneous multiomics datasets (panomics) and techniques for nonparametric validation of best-fit models. Strategies to overcome common pitfalls that are unique to data-intensive radiomics are also discussed. (C) The Authors. Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 153 条
[1]
High-throughput protein expression analysis using tissue microarray technology of a large well-characterised series identifies biologically distinct classes of breast cancer confirming recent cDNA expression analyses [J].
Abd El-Rehim, DM ;
Ball, G ;
Pinder, SE ;
Rakha, E ;
Paish, C ;
Robertson, JFR ;
Macmillan, D ;
Blamey, RW ;
Ellis, IO .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2005, 116 (03) :340-350
[2]
Acosta O, 2010, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V6367, P42, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-15989-3_6
[3]
The Potential of Radiomic-Based Phenotyping in PrecisionMedicine A Review [J].
Aerts, Hugo J. W. L. .
JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2016, 2 (12) :1636-1642
[4]
Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle [J].
Akaike, Hirotogu .
Trees - Structure and Function, 2015, 29 (06) :655-662
[5]
Ali A.-R, 2016, INTELL SYST REF LIB
[6]
Artificial neural networks for decision-making in urologic oncology [J].
Anagnostou, T ;
Remzi, M ;
Lykourinas, M ;
Djavan, D .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2003, 43 (06) :596-603
[7]
Biomarker studies: a call for a comprehensive biomarker study registry [J].
Andre, Fabrice ;
McShane, Lisa M. ;
Michiels, Stefan ;
Ransohoff, David F. ;
Altman, Douglas G. ;
Reis-Filho, Jorge S. ;
Hayes, Daniel F. ;
Pusztai, Lajos .
NATURE REVIEWS CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 8 (03) :171-176
[8]
[Anonymous], 2017, ARXIV171209923
[9]
[Anonymous], 2015, ADAPTIVE CONTROL PRO
[10]
Fully automated quantitative cephalometry using convolutional neural networks [J].
Arik S.Ö. ;
Ibragimov B. ;
Xing L. .
Journal of Medical Imaging, 2017, 4 (01)