Double-blind comparison of an oral Escherichia coli preparation and mesalazine in maintaining remission of ulcerative colitis

被引:579
作者
Kruis, W
Schutz, E
Fric, P
Fixa, B
Judmaier, G
Stolte, M
机构
[1] CASTRA REGINA CTR, REGENSBURG, GERMANY
[2] DEPT MED, LAB GASTROENTEROL, PRAGUE, CZECH REPUBLIC
[3] CHARLES UNIV CLIN, HRADEC KRALOVE, CZECH REPUBLIC
[4] UNIV INNSBRUCK, KLIN INNERE MED GASTROENTEROL & HEPATOL, A-6020 INNSBRUCK, AUSTRIA
[5] INST PATHOL, BAYREUTH, GERMANY
关键词
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2036.1997.00225.x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Aminosalicylates are used as standard treatment for maintaining remission in ulcerative colitis. As yet, there is no other existing alternative with proven efficacy. In light of the hypothesis that the intestinal environment map contribute to the pathophysiology of ulcerative colitis, a trial was conducted to test the effects of probiotic treatment with an oral preparation of non-pathogenic E. coli. Methods: A total of 120 patients with inactive ulcerative colitis were included in a double-blind, double-dummy study comparing mesalazine 500 mg t.d.s. to an oral preparation of viable E. coli strain Nissle (Serotype 06: K5: H1) for 12 weeks with regard to their efficacy in preventing a relapse of the disease, Study objectives were to assess the equivalence of the clinical activity index (CAI) under the two treatment modalities and to compare relapse rates, relapse-free times and global assessment, Results: The start and end scores of the CAI demonstrated no significant difference (P = 0.12) between the two treatment groups. Relapse rates were 11.3% under mesalazine and 16.0% under E. coli Nissle 1917 (N.S.). Life table analysis showed a relapse-free time of 103 +/- 4 days for mesalazine and 106 +/- 5 days for E. coli Nissle 1917 (N.S.). Global assessment was similar for both groups. Tolerability to the treatment was excellent and did not differ, No serious adverse events were reported. Conclusions: From the results of this preliminary study, probiotic treatment appears to offer another option for maintenance therapy of ulcerative colitis. Additional support is provided for the hypothesis of a pathophysiological role for the intestinal environment in ulcerative colitis.
引用
收藏
页码:853 / 858
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] ALLGAYER H, 1992, GASTROENTEROL CLIN N, V21, P643
  • [2] BENNET JD, 1989, LANCET, V1, P164
  • [3] ULCERATIVE-COLITIS AND ESCHERICHIA-COLI WITH ADHESIVE PROPERTIES
    BURKE, DA
    AXON, ATR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1987, 40 (07) : 782 - 786
  • [4] ADHESIVE ESCHERICHIA-COLI IN INFLAMMATORY BOWEL-DISEASE AND INFECTIVE DIARRHEA
    BURKE, DA
    AXON, ATR
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1988, 297 (6641): : 102 - 104
  • [5] ADVERSE REACTIONS DURING SALICYLAZOSULFAPYRIDINE THERAPY AND RELATION WITH DRUG-METABOLISM AND ACETYLATOR PHENOTYPE
    DAS, KM
    EASTWOOD, MA
    MCMANUS, JPA
    SIRCUS, W
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1973, 289 (10) : 491 - 495
  • [6] DIGNASS A, 1995, INFLAMM BOWEL DIS, P183
  • [7] GORBACH SL, 1987, LANCET, V2, P1519
  • [8] HOCKERTZ S, 1991, ARZNEIMITTEL-FORSCH, V41-2, P1108
  • [9] CONTROLLED TRIAL COMPARING OLSALAZINE AND SULPHASALAZINE FOR THE MAINTENANCE TREATMENT OF ULCERATIVE-COLITIS
    IRELAND, A
    MASON, CH
    JEWELL, DP
    [J]. GUT, 1988, 29 (06) : 835 - 837
  • [10] PROPHYLACTIC EFFECTS OF OLSALAZINE V SULFASALAZINE DURING 12 MONTHS MAINTENANCE TREATMENT OF ULCERATIVE-COLITIS
    KIILERICH, S
    LADEFOGED, K
    RANNEM, T
    RANLOV, PJ
    [J]. GUT, 1992, 33 (02) : 252 - 255