Efficacy of continuous infusion of ceftazidime for patients with neutropenic fever after high-dose chemotherapy and peripheral blood stem cell transplantation

被引:19
作者
Egerer, G
Goldschmidt, H
Salwender, H
Hegenbart, U
Ehrhard, I
Haas, R
Ho, AD
机构
[1] Univ Heidelberg, Dept Internal Med 5, D-69115 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Univ Leipzig, Dept Haematol, D-7010 Leipzig, Germany
[3] Univ Heidelberg, Inst Hyg, D-69115 Heidelberg, Germany
[4] Univ Dusseldorf, Dept Haematol Oncol & Clin Immunol, D-4000 Dusseldorf, Germany
关键词
neutropenia; outpatient treatment; ceftazidime; high-dose chemotherapy;
D O I
10.1016/S0924-8579(00)00155-2
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Neutropenia is an important complication of high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT). Neutropenic patients presenting with fever are routinely hospitalized for treatment with broad-spectrum antibiotics. Neutropenia up to 10 days is associated with a low-risk profile, and antimicrobial therapy administered on an outpatient basis might be an alternative to admission to hospital. This prospective study evaluates the safety of a continuous infusion of ceftazidime in neutropenic patients after HDCT and peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT). From September 1995 to October 1999, 81 patients received a 2 g intravenous bolus of ceftazidime, followed by a 4 g continuous infusion per 24 h of ceftazidime using a portable infusion pump. If the fryer persisted for 72 h, a glycopeptide antibiotic was added. The median patients' age was 44 years. Fifty-two of 81 patients (64%) responded to the monotherapy with ceftazidime. After addition of a glycopeptide antibiotic, a further 17 patients (21%) became afebrile. The causes of fever were septicaemia in 11 patients, pneumonia in two and fever of unknown origin in 68 patients. Fifty-eight episodes (72%) were successfully managed by outpatient treatment alone. The reason for admission to hospital was the change to imipenem/cilastin, which had to be administered three times per day (12 patients), severe mucositis with parenteral nutrition (eight patients), or a Karnovsky index less than or equal to 60 (three patients). In six of these cases, outpatient treatment was resumed after a brief period of in-patient care. In no case was the treatment terminated because of failure of the pump. With daily follow-up and close monitoring for development of complications, it is possible to discharge patients earlier after HDCT and PBSCT, thereby decreasing costs. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. and International Society of Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 123
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   IS IT TIME TO REDEFINE THE MANAGEMENT OF FEBRILE NEUTROPENIA IN CANCER-PATIENTS [J].
ANAISSIE, EJ ;
VADHANRAJ, S .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1995, 98 (03) :221-223
[2]  
BODY GP, 1966, ANN INTERN MED, V64, P328
[3]   EFFICACY AND TOXICITY OF SINGLE DAILY DOSES OF AMIKACIN AND CEFTRIAXONE VERSUS MULTIPLE DAILY DOSES OF AMIKACIN AND CEFTAZIDIME FOR INFECTION IN PATIENTS WITH CANCER AND GRANULOCYTOPENIA [J].
CALANDRA, T ;
ZINNER, SH ;
VISCOLI, C ;
DEBOCK, R ;
GAYA, H ;
MEUNIER, F ;
KLASTERSKY, J ;
GLAUSER, MP ;
NINOVE, D ;
LANGENAEKEN, J ;
PAESMANS, M ;
GALAZZO, M ;
GIDDEY, M ;
BILLE, J ;
HADJDJILANI, A ;
MASSIMO, L ;
MORONI, C ;
CASTAGNOLA, E ;
SANZ, M ;
FERSTER, A ;
DEBOCK, R ;
MEUNIER, F ;
KLASTERSKY, J ;
PADMOS, A ;
GALLAGHER, J ;
COMETTA, A ;
GLAUSER, MP ;
CALANDRA, T ;
LOPEZ, A ;
MARTINEZDALMAU, A ;
POGLIANI, E ;
HEMMER, R ;
DICATO, M ;
RIES, F ;
PORCELLINI, A ;
LEGRAND, JC ;
PORCELLINI, A ;
ESTAVOYER, JM ;
FOLLATH, F ;
SEITANIDES, B ;
ZINNER, S ;
BROWNE, M ;
NIKOSKELAINEN, J ;
ROSSI, M ;
MASERA, G .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1993, 119 (07) :584-593
[4]   Monotherapy with meropenem versus combination therapy with ceftazidime plus amikacin as empiric therapy for fever in granulocytopenic patients with cancer [J].
Cometta, AF ;
Calandra, T ;
Gaya, H ;
Zinner, SH ;
deBock, R ;
DelFavero, A ;
Bucaneve, G ;
Crokaert, F ;
Kern, WV ;
Klastersky, J ;
Langenaeken, J ;
Micozzi, A ;
Padmos, A ;
Paesmans, M ;
Viscoli, C ;
Glauser, MP ;
Martino, P ;
Caballero, D ;
Engelhard, D ;
Shapiro, M ;
Castagnola, E ;
Massimo, L ;
Giacchino, R ;
Sanz, M ;
Gigium, M ;
Carotenuto, M ;
Lopez, A ;
Andrien, JM ;
Paulus, R ;
Martino, B ;
Nobile, F ;
Togni, P ;
Ferster, A ;
Cudillo, L ;
Legrand, JC ;
Dinota, A ;
Cajozzo, A ;
Quintini, G ;
MartinezDalmau, A ;
Nosari, A ;
Bucaneve, GP ;
Cometta, A ;
Galazzo, M ;
Giddey, M ;
Bille, J ;
Blaser, J .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1996, 40 (05) :1108-1115
[5]   CEFTAZIDIME COMPARED WITH PIPERACILLIN AND TOBRAMYCIN FOR THE EMPIRIC TREATMENT OF FEVER IN NEUTROPENIC PATIENTS WITH CANCER - A MULTICENTER RANDOMIZED TRIAL [J].
DEPAUW, BE ;
DERESINSKI, SC ;
FELD, R ;
LANEALLMAN, EF ;
DONNELLY, JP .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1994, 120 (10) :834-844
[6]   Ceftazidime in combination with glycopeptide antibiotic is an effective first-line therapy for patients undergoing high-dose therapy with autologous peripheral blood stem cell support [J].
Egerer, G ;
Goldschmidt, H ;
Streich, N ;
Ehrhard, I ;
Sonntag, HG ;
Haas, R .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 1999, 7 (05) :336-342
[7]   A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL OF CEFTRIAXONE AND TEICOPLANIN VERSUS CEFTAZIDIME AND TEICOPLANIN AS ANTIBIOTIC-THERAPY IN FEBRILE NEUTROPENIC CANCER-PATIENTS AND BONE-MARROW TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS [J].
FAUSER, AA ;
LANG, E ;
KOCHLING, G ;
DASCHNER, FD .
INFECTION, 1994, 22 (04) :271-275
[8]   1997 guidelines for the use of antimicrobial agents in neutropenic patients with unexplained fever [J].
Hughes, WT ;
Armstrong, D ;
Bodey, GP ;
Brown, AE ;
Edwards, JE ;
Feld, R ;
Pizzo, P ;
Rolston, KVI ;
Shenep, JL ;
Young, LS .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1997, 25 (03) :551-573
[9]   Oral versus intravenous empirical antimicrobial therapy for fever in patients with granulocytopenia who are receiving cancer chemotherapy [J].
Kern, WV ;
Cometta, A ;
de Rock, R ;
Langenaeken, J ;
Paesmans, M ;
Gaya, H .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 341 (05) :312-318
[10]   EMPIRIC TREATMENT OF INFECTION DURING GRANULOCYTOPENIA [J].
KLASTERSKY, J .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1990, 1 (04) :255-261