Factors predicting recovery of erections after radical prostatectomy

被引:338
作者
Rabbani, F
Stapleton, AMF
Kattan, MW
Wheeler, TM
Scardino, PT
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Urol, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Repatriat Gen Hosp, Dept Urol, Daw Pk, Australia
[3] Baylor Coll Med, Dept Pathol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Methodist Hosp, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
prostatic neoplasms; prostatectomy; impotence; penile erection; risk factors;
D O I
10.1016/S0022-5347(05)66921-2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Because preservation of functioning penile erections is a major concern for many patients considering treatment for localized prostate cancer, we analyzed various factors determined before and after radical retropubic prostatectomy to identify those significantly associated with recovery of erectile function. Materials and Methods: Our prospective database of patients undergoing pelvic lymphadenectomy and radical retropubic prostatectomy was used to determine factors predictive of erection recovery after radical prostatectomy. The study included 314 consecutive men with prostate cancer treated with radical retropubic prostatectomy between November 1993 and December 1996. Preoperative potency satisfactory for intercourse and degree of neurovascular bundle preservation during the operation were documented. Results: Patient age, preoperative potency status and extent of neurovascular bundle preservation but not pathological stage were predictive of potency recovery after radical prostatectomy. At 3 years after the operation 76% of men younger than age 60 years with full erections preoperatively who had bilateral neurovascular bundle preservation would be expected to regain erections sufficient for intercourse. Compared to the younger men, those 60 to 65 years old were only 56% (95% confidence interval [CI] 37 to 84) and those older than 65 years were 47% (95% CI 30 to 73) as likely to recover potency. Patients with recently diminished erections were only 63% (95% CI 38 to 100) as likely to recover potency as men with full erections preoperatively, and those with partial erections were only 47% (95% CI 23 to 96) as likely to recover potency. Resection of 1 neurovascular bundle reduced the chance of recovery to 25% (95% CI 10 to 61) compared to preserving both nerves. Conclusions: Knowledge of preoperative erectile function and patient age before the operation and the degree of neurovascular bundle preservation afterward may aid in patient counseling regarding potency recovery after radical prostatectomy.
引用
收藏
页码:1929 / 1934
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
BEAHRS OH, 1992, HDB STAGING CANC, P189
[2]   RETURN OF ERECTIONS AND URINARY CONTINENCE FOLLOWING NERVE SPARING RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY [J].
CATALONA, WJ ;
BASLER, JW .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1993, 150 (03) :905-907
[3]   Potency, continence and complication rates in 1,870 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies [J].
Catalona, WJ ;
Carvalhal, GF ;
Mager, DE ;
Smith, DS .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1999, 162 (02) :433-438
[4]   PARTIAL LIKELIHOOD [J].
COX, DR .
BIOMETRIKA, 1975, 62 (02) :269-276
[5]  
COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187
[6]  
EASTHAM JA, 2000, COMPREHENSIVE TXB GE, P722
[7]   NERVE SPARING RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY - A DIFFERENT VIEW [J].
GEARY, ES ;
DENDINGER, TE ;
FREIHA, FS ;
STAMEY, TA .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 154 (01) :145-149
[8]   NONPARAMETRIC-ESTIMATION FROM INCOMPLETE OBSERVATIONS [J].
KAPLAN, EL ;
MEIER, P .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1958, 53 (282) :457-481
[9]  
Klotz L, 1998, UROLOGY, V52, P537, DOI 10.1016/S0090-4295(98)00319-7
[10]  
METTLIN C, 1994, UROLOGY, V43, P488, DOI 10.1016/0090-4295(94)90236-4