Assay standardization bias: Different prostate cancer detection rates and clinical outcomes resulting from different assays for free and total prostate-specific antigen

被引:14
作者
Sotelo, Rene J.
Mora, K. Elias
Perez, L. Hermes
Novoa, John
Carmona, Oswaldo
De Andrade, Robert
Borges, Rafael E.
Parada, David
Loeb, Stacy
Catalona, William J.
机构
[1] Cauro Fdn, Inst Med Floresta, Caracas 1080, Venezuela
[2] Georgetown Univ, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Washington, DC USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Dept Urol, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2007.02.006
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives Numerous commercial assays are available for measuring total and free prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels in serum. These assays can be referenced to different laboratory standards, and interassay variability Occurs. Patients and physicians might be affected by the variability between PSA assays that results from the use of different PSA standards. Methods We prospectively compared the free and total PSA measurements obtained using two commercially available PSA assays in 103 participants from a prostate cancer screening program in Caracas, Venezuela. We recommended biopsy to men with a total PSA level of 3 to 10 ng/mL and a free/total PSA ratio of 20% or less with either assay. We compared the sensitivity, specificity, and concordance index between the two assays to assess the effects of interassay variability on the cancer detection rate and clinical outcomes. Results Although the total PSA results were similar between the assays, the free PSA level was significantly greater with one assay. Therefore, the free/total PSA ratio was discordant between the two assays, resulting in different biopsy recommendations and cancer detection rates. Conclusions Using a free/total PSA ratio of 20% or less as the threshold for biopsy, the differences in assay sensitivity and specificity for detecting prostate cancer are significant. Commercially available assays for PSA and its derivatives are not necessarily interchangeable, and these differences might lead to different clinical Outcomes. When using free and total PSA measurements to make clinical decisions, patients and physicians should be aware of the potential standardization bias and which assay is being used.
引用
收藏
页码:1143 / 1146
页数:4
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   Discordant performance of assays for free and total prostate-specific antigen in relation to the early detection of prostate cancer [J].
Blijenberg, BG ;
Yurdakul, G ;
Van Zelst, B ;
Bangma, CH ;
Wildhagen, MF ;
Schröder, FH .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 88 (06) :545-550
[2]   LONGITUDINAL EVALUATION OF PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN LEVELS IN MEN WITH AND WITHOUT PROSTATE DISEASE [J].
CARTER, HB ;
PEARSON, JD ;
METTER, J ;
BRANT, LJ ;
CHAN, DW ;
ANDRES, R ;
FOZARD, JL ;
WALSH, PC .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1992, 267 (16) :2215-2220
[3]  
CATALONA WJ, 1995, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V274, P1214
[4]   COMPARISON OF A POLYCLONAL AND MONOCLONAL IMMUNOASSAY FOR PSA - NEED FOR AN INTERNATIONAL ANTIGEN STANDARD [J].
GRAVES, HCB ;
WEHNER, N ;
STAMEY, TA .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1990, 144 (06) :1516-1522
[5]  
Jung K, 1996, CLIN CHEM, V42, P1026
[6]   Comparability of serum prostate-specific antigen measurement between the Hybritech Tandem-R and Abbott AxSYM assays [J].
Leewansangtong, S ;
Goktas, S ;
Lepoff, R ;
Holthaus, K ;
Crawford, ED .
UROLOGY, 1998, 52 (03) :467-469
[7]   Variation in prostate specific antigen results from 2 different assay platforms: Clinical impact on 2,304 patients undergoing prostate cancer screening [J].
Link, RE ;
Shariat, SF ;
Nguyen, CV ;
Farr, A ;
Weinberg, AD ;
Morton, RA ;
Richardson, B ;
Bernard, D ;
Slawin, KM .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (06) :2234-2238
[8]   Comparison of 3 investigational assays for the free form of prostate specific antigen [J].
Nixon, RG ;
Meyer, GE ;
Blase, AB ;
Gold, MH ;
Brawer, MK .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 160 (02) :420-425
[9]   Comparison of three assays for total serum prostate-specific antigen and percentage of free prostate-specific antigen in predicting prostate histology [J].
Roehrborn, CG ;
Gregory, A ;
Mcconnell, JD ;
Sagalowsky, AI ;
Wians, FH .
UROLOGY, 1996, 48 (6A) :23-32
[10]   RATE OF CHANGE IN SERUM PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN LEVELS AS A METHOD FOR PROSTATE-CANCER DETECTION [J].
SMITH, DS ;
CATALONA, WJ .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1994, 152 (04) :1163-1167